ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Intravitreal ranibizumab injection combined with photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of combination treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injection and photodynamic therapy (PDT) for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). A total of 64 patients with PCV were included in the present study, which were divided into the IVR monotherapy group (Group A) and combination treatment groups (Groups B-D) with different treatment intervals. All subjects were followed-up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following treatment, and subjected to the detection of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT). Compared with the monotherapy group, more significant BCVA improvement was observed for the combination treatment groups, with the most evident effect exhibited in Group C. At the end of the follow-up period, visual acuity improvement rates were markedly elevated in the combination treatment groups, as compared with the monotherapy group. According to optical coherence tomography, the CFT for the combination treatment groups was thinner than the monotherapy group. Among the combination groups, CFT improvement for Group C was superior to other groups. Fundus angiography demonstrated that, compared with monotherapy, combination treatment may significantly promote the regression and prevent the recurrence of polyps and BVN. The most efficient effectiveness was observed for Group C. In addition, combination treatment may significantly reduce the IVR injection numbers required to treat PCV. Patients receiving combination treatment with IVR injection and PDT have greater vision improvements, reduced macular degeneration and decreased injection numbers. Combination therapy may therefore, represent an effective and safe therapeutic strategy for PCV clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.