Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29434527›Full record

ArticleBiological procedures online2018

Visualisation of Multiple Tight Junctional Complexes in Human Airway Epithelial Cells.

Alysia G Buckley, Kevin Looi, Thomas Iosifidis, Kak-Ming Ling, Erika N Sutanto, Kelly M Martinovich, Elizabeth Kicic-Starcevich, Luke W Garratt, Nicole C Shaw, Francis J Lannigan and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological procedures online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cinnamaldehyde Protects againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Pathogenesis ofInfection and immunity · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparison of Fixation Methods for the Detection of Claudin 1 and E-Cadherin in Breast Cancer Cell Lines by Immunofluorescence.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2022
    Article
  14. A comparison of three mucus-secreting airway cell lines (Calu-3, SPOC1 and UNCN3T) for use as biopharmaceutical models of the nose and lung.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2021
    Article
  15. Cystic Fibrosis Clinical Isolates ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Alysia G Buckley1Centre of Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Kevin Looi2School of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Thomas Iosifidis2School of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Kak-Ming Ling4Telethon Kids Institute, Centre for Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Erika N Sutanto4Telethon Kids Institute, Centre for Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Kelly M Martinovich4Telethon Kids Institute, Centre for Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Elizabeth Kicic-Starcevich4Telethon Kids Institute, Centre for Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Luke W Garratt2School of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Nicole C Shaw4Telethon Kids Institute, Centre for Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Francis J LanniganSchool of Medicine, Notre Dame University, Fremantle, Western Australia 6160 Australia.
Alexander N Larcombe4Telethon Kids Institute, Centre for Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Graeme Zosky4Telethon Kids Institute, Centre for Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Darryl A Knight8School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales Australia.
Paul J Rigby1Centre of Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
Anthony Kicic2School of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0008-9733
Stephen M Stick2School of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009 Australia.
The Kids Research Institute Australia · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUSt John of God Subiaco Hospital · AUThe University of Notre Dame Australia · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApically located tight junctions in airway epithelium perform a fundamental role in controlling macromolecule migration through paracellular spaces. Alterations in their expression may lead to disruptions in barrier integrity, which subsequently facilitates entry of potential bacterial and other pathogens into the host. Furthermore, there is emerging evidence that the barrier integrity of the airway in certain airway inflammatory diseases may be altered. However, there is little consensus on the way this is assessed and measured and the type of cells used to achieve this.

methodsHere, we assessed four fixation methods including; (i) 4% (

resultsPositive staining was observed following methanol fixation for claudin-1 and ZO-1 tight junction proteins but no staining was detected for occludin in 16HBE14o- cells. Combinatorial fixation with methanol and acetone also produced consistent positive staining for both occludin and ZO-1 tight junction proteins in these cells. When assessed using primary cells cultured at air-liquid interface, similar positive staining for claudin-1 and ZO-1 was observed following methanol fixation, while similar positive staining for occludin and ZO-1 was observed following the same combinatorial fixation with methanol and acetone.

conclusionsThe present study demonstrates the importance of a personalised approach to optimise staining for the visualisation of different tight junction proteins. Of significance, the workflow, once optimised, can readily be translated into primary airway epithelial cell air-liquid interface cultures where it can be used to assess barrier integrity in chronic lung diseases.

Indexed as

Air liquid interfaceAirway epithelial cellsConfocal microscopyFixationTight junctions

Identifiers

PMID29434527
PMCPMC5793437
OpenAlexW2796780143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.