Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29434524›Full record

ArticleClinical and molecular allergy : CMA2018

The control of allergic rhinitis in real life: a multicenter cross-sectional Italian study.

Federica Gani, Carlo Lombardi, Laura Barrocu, Massimo Landi, Erminia Ridolo, Massimo Bugiani, Giovanni Rolla, Gianenrico Senna, Giovanni Passalacqua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessment of Nasal Smear Eosinophil Counts in Allergic Rhinitis: How Useful is it?Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Federica GaniAllergy Service, Azienda Ospedaliera "San Luigi Orbassano", Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5199-5878
Carlo Lombardi2Departmental Unit of Allergology & Respiratory Diseases, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Laura BarrocuAllergy Service, Azienda Ospedaliera "San Luigi Orbassano", Turin, Italy.
Massimo LandiPrimary Care Pediatrician, National Healthcare System, Turin, Italy.
Erminia Ridolo4Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Massimo BugianiConsultant Physician of Professional Diseases Observatory, Procura della Repubblica, Turin, Italy.
Giovanni Rolla6Allergology and Immunology, University of Turin, AO Mauriziano, Turin, Italy.
Gianenrico Senna7Asthma Center and Allergy Unit, Verona University and General Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni Passalacqua8Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS San Martino-IST University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
A. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino · ITFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITMartin University · USUniversity of Parma · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergic Rhinitis (AR) is a high-prevalence disease. In Europe about 25% of the general population is affected, and in Italy the prevalence is estimated to be 19.8%. The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) international document underlined that the prevalence of severe or refractory or overlapping rhinitis is increasing and represents a non-negligible socio-economic burden. In general, despite the social healthcare costs, allergic rhinitis remains underestimated, not sufficiently controlled and often undertreated. AIM OF THE STUDY: In this multi-center Italian observational and prospective study we assessed the control of AR in patients (> 16 years) without previous asthma diagnosis, referred to Allergy Centers.

methodsPatients of both sexes and older than 16 with rhinitis symptoms and without asthma were studied. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the CARAT (Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test) were used as patient reported outcome. The possible causes of poor control of AR, as per protocol, were assessed accordingly.

resultsWe observed 250 patients in a real-life setting: more than 60% of them had an uncontrolled AR, only about 50% used multiple medications, and only a minority were receiving allergen immunotherapy.

conclusionThis survey, conducted in a real-life setting, confirmed that AR is overall poorly controlled. The VAS assessment well correlates with the structured CARAT questionnaire and with the relevant symptoms of AR.

Indexed as

Allergic rhinitisControlReal-life

Identifiers

PMID29434524
PMCPMC5797368
OpenAlexW2789706922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.