Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29434476›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer : basic and clinical research2018

Interest of Supportive and Barrier Protective Skin Care Products in the Daily Prevention and Treatment of Cutaneous Toxicity During Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Antoine Berger, Carlos Regueiro, Tarek Hijal, David Pasquier, Cristina De La Fuente, Florence Le Tinier, Bernard Coche-Dequeant, Eric Lartigau, Dominique Moyal, Sophie Seité and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer : basic and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The role of dermocosmetics in the management of cancer-related skin toxicities: international expert consensus.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Antoine BergerCHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Carlos RegueiroHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Tarek HijalMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
David PasquierCentre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Cristina De La FuenteHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Florence Le TinierCentre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Bernard Coche-DequeantCentre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Eric LartigauCentre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Dominique MoyalLa Roche-Posay Dermatological Laboratory, Levallois-Perret, France.
Sophie SeitéLa Roche-Posay Dermatological Laboratory, Levallois-Perret, France.
René-Jean BensadounCHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Centre Oscar Lambret · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESRoche (France) · FRMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs many as 50% of patients with cancer develop acute skin reactions to some degree with radiotherapy. Proactive skin care is often recommended to minimise these skin reactions and maintain the integrity of the epidermal barrier; nevertheless, no consensual guidelines are systematically used. This multicentre, observational, prospective study evaluated the tolerability and benefit of supportive and barrier protective skin care products in preventing radiotherapy-induced skin reactions in 253 women initiating radiotherapy (exclusive or adjuvant) for breast cancer.

methodsPatients received a kit of 5 commercially available skin care products before the first radiotherapy treatment. The following variables were assessed: cutaneous adverse events, investigator-assessed skin reactions (oedema, erythema, dryness, desquamation) before and after radiotherapy course, investigator, and patient opinion on products benefit. Results were analysed by frequency of product use (heavy versus low).

resultsAverage age was 60 years (range: 34-85). Over 92% of patients reported good to excellent tolerance on irradiated skin for each product. During the 6-week radiotherapy period, we observed that heavy product users had less skin reactions than the low users, particularly within 10 days of radiotherapy initiation (8% versus 18%;

conclusionsThese results support recommendations to use skin care products to minimise the impact of secondary cutaneous reactions with radiotherapy cancer treatment.

Indexed as

cosmeticdermatologic toxicitypalliative careradiotherapySkin care

Identifiers

PMID29434476
PMCPMC5802618
OpenAlexW2793479406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.