Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29434339›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2018

Epidemiology and biomarker profile of pituitary adenohypophysial tumors.

Ozgur Mete, Amber Cintosun, Irwin Pressman, Sylvia L Asa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ozgur MeteDepartment of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Amber CintosunDepartment of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Irwin PressmanSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Carlton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sylvia L AsaDepartment of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada. sylvia.asa@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-5054
University Health Network · CACarleton University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have reported the prevalence of pituitary tumors to be ~1/1000 population. Many are prolactin-producing tumors that are managed medically, however, the epidemiology of surgically resected pituitary adenohypophysial neuroendocrine tumors has not been reported in a large series with detailed characterization. We reviewed 1055 adenohypophysial tumors from 1169 transsphenoidal resections from the pathology files of University Health Network, Toronto, 2001-2016. Tumors were characterized by immunohistochemical localization of transcription factors (Pit-1, ERα, SF-1, Tpit), hormones (adrenocorticotropin, growth hormone, prolactin, β-thyrotropin, β-folliculotropin, β-luteotropin, α-subunit), and other biomarkers (keratins, Ki67, p27, FGFR4). Electron microscopy was used only for unusual lesions. In this cohort, 51.3% of patients were female; the average age was 51 years. Gonadotroph tumors represented 42.5%. Pit-1-lineage-tumors represented 29.9%; these were subclassified as growth-hormone-predominant (somatotroph/mammosomatotroph/mixed; 53%), prolactin-predominant (lactotroph/acidophil-stem-cell; 28%), thyrotrophs (2%), plurihormonal (14%), and not-otherwise-specified (3%). Corticotroph tumors represented 17.1%. Only 4.5% were null cell tumors and 0.5% were unusual plurihormonal tumors. In 5.5% the tumor was not characterized for technical reasons (sample size, fixation, necrosis or other artifact). All corticotroph and plurihormonal tumors were positive for keratins; others tumors showed variable negativity with highest rates in gonadotroph (37.1%) and null cell tumors (28.2%). Tumors with a Ki67 ≥ 3% comprised 60% of this cohort. Global loss of p27 was most frequent in corticotroph neoplasms, specifically those associated with elevated glucocorticoid levels. Corticotroph and lactotroph tumors were more common among females; gonadotroph tumors were more common among males. Younger patients had mainly corticotroph and Pit-1-lineage neoplasms, whereas older patients harbored mainly gonadotroph tumors. This represents one of the largest surgical series of morphologically characterized pituitary tumors reported to date and the first to include the routine use of transcription factors for tumor classification. The data provide the basis for clinicopathologic correlations that are helpful for prognostic and predictive patient management.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBiomarkersChildFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedPituitary GlandPituitary NeoplasmsPrevalenceBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID29434339
OpenAlexW2787971552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.