Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29434301›Full record

ReviewNature communications2018

Advancing behavioural genomics by considering timescale.

Clare C Rittschof, Kimberly A Hughes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Linking individual fitness to the evolution of cognition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The role of the genome in experience-dependent plasticity: Extending the analogy of the genomic action potential.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Review
  13. Genes and environments, development and time.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Honey bee colony aggression and indirect genetic effects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clare C RittschofDepartment of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA. clare.rittschof@uky.edu.
Kimberly A HughesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal behavioural traits often covary with gene expression, pointing towards a genomic constraint on organismal responses to environmental cues. This pattern highlights a gap in our understanding of the time course of environmentally responsive gene expression, and moreover, how these dynamics are regulated. Advances in behavioural genomics explore how gene expression dynamics are correlated with behavioural traits that range from stable to highly labile. We consider the idea that certain genomic regulatory mechanisms may predict the timescale of an environmental effect on behaviour. This temporally minded approach could inform both organismal and evolutionary questions ranging from the remediation of early life social trauma to understanding the evolution of trait plasticity.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalGene-Environment InteractionGene Expression RegulationGenetics, BehavioralAnimalsBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGenomicsPhenotypeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29434301
PMCPMC5809431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.