Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29434230›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Comparing the similarity and difference of three influenza surveillance systems in China.

Xiaoting Yang, Dongpeng Liu, Kongfu Wei, Xinfeng Liu, Lei Meng, Deshan Yu, Hongyu Li, Baodi Li, Jian He, Wenbiao Hu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaoting YangDivision of Infectious Disease, Gansu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Dongpeng LiuDivision of Infectious Disease, Gansu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Kongfu WeiDivision of Infectious Disease, Gansu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Xinfeng LiuDivision of Infectious Disease, Gansu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Lei MengDivision of Infectious Disease, Gansu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Deshan YuDivision of Infectious Disease, Gansu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Hongyu LiDivision of Infectious Disease, Gansu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Baodi LiDivision of Infectious Disease, Gansu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Jian HeDivision of Infectious Disease, Gansu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China. 1014770674@qq.com.
Wenbiao HuSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. w2.hu@qut.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three main surveillance systems (laboratory-confirmed, influenza-like illness (ILI) and nationwide Notifiable Infectious Diseases Reporting Information System (NIDRIS)) have been used for influenza surveillance in China. However, it is unclear which surveillance system is more reliable in developing influenza early warning system based on surveillance data. This study aims to evaluate the similarity and difference of the three surveillance systems and provide practical knowledge for improving the effectiveness of influenza surveillance. Weekly influenza data for the three systems were obtained from March 2010 to February 2015. Spearman correlation and time series seasonal decomposition were used to assess the relationship between the three surveillance systems and to explore seasonal patterns and characteristics of influenza epidemics in Gansu, China. Our results showed influenza epidemics appeared a single-peak around January in all three surveillance systems. Time series seasonal decomposition analysis demonstrated a similar seasonal pattern in the three systems, while long-term trends were observed to be different. Our research suggested that a combination of the NIDRIS together with ILI and laboratory-confirmed surveillance is an informative, comprehensive way to monitor influenza transmission in Gansu, China. These results will provide a useful information for developing influenza early warning systems based on influenza surveillance data.

Indexed as

EpidemicsAdolescentAdultAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolChinaComparative Effectiveness ResearchFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedPopulation Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID29434230
PMCPMC5809380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.