ArticleEuropean urology2018
Refined Analysis of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics to Predict Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Outcomes.
Article in European urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Aquablation for LUTS due to BPH in men with localized prostate cancer.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Predictive models for biopsy upgrading in active surveillance for prostate cancer: a scoping review.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Single-layer biosensor for urinary prostate-cancer biomarkers through transition-metal-doped graphene: a DFT study.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Estimating optimally tailored active surveillance strategy under interval censoring.Biometrics · 2025Article
- A Personalized, Risk-Based Approach to Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer with Takeaways from Broader Oncology Practices: A Mixed Methods Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Prostate cancer and solid organ transplantation: patient management and outcomes.BJU international · 2025Article
- Personalized Dynamic Prediction Model for Biopsy Timing in Patients With Prostate Cancer During Active Surveillance.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Is Active Surveillance Too Active?Current urology reports · 2023Review
- Article
- Treatment in the absence of disease reclassification among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.Cancer · 2022Article
- Genetic Factors Associated with Prostate Cancer Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment.HGG advances · 2022Article
- Liquid biomarkers in active surveillance.World journal of urology · 2022Review
- Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer: Role of Available Biomarkers in Daily Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity With Clinical Progression Among African American and Non-Hispanic White Men Treated for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer With Active Surveillance.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- The impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients.BJUI compass · 2021Article
- Five-gene signature associating with Gleason score serve as novel biomarkers for identifying early recurring events and contributing to early diagnosis for Prostate Adenocarcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor men on active surveillance for prostate cancer, utility of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics (PSAk) in predicting pathologic reclassification remains controversial.
objectiveTo develop prediction methods for utilizing serial PSA and evaluate frequency of collection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsData were collected from men enrolled in the multicenter Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study, for whom PSA data were measured and biopsies performed on prespecified schedules. We developed a PSAk parameter based on a linear mixed-effect model (LMEM) that accounted for serial PSA levels. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The association of diagnostic PSA and/or PSAk with time to reclassification (increase in cancer grade and/or volume) was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 851 men met the study criteria; 255 (30%) had a reclassification event within 5 yr. Median follow-up was 3.7 yr. After adjusting for prostate size, time since diagnosis, biopsy parameters, and diagnostic PSA, PSAk was a significant predictor of reclassification (hazard ratio for each 0.10 increase in PSAk=1.6 [95% confidence interval 1.2-2.1, p<0.001]). The PSAk model improved stratification of risk prediction for the top and bottom deciles of risk over a model without PSAk. Model performance was essentially identical using PSA data measured every 6 mo to those measured every 3 mo. The major limitation is the reliability of reclassification as an end point, although it drives most treatment decisions.
conclusionsPSAk calculated using an LMEM statistically significantly predicts biopsy reclassification. Models that use repeat PSA measurements outperform a model incorporating only diagnostic PSA. Model performance is similar using PSA assessed every 3 or 6 mo. If validated, these results should inform optimal incorporation of PSA trends into active surveillance protocols and risk calculators. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at whether repeat prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements, or PSA kinetics, improve prediction of biopsy outcomes in men using active surveillance to manage localized prostate cancer. We found that in a large multicenter active surveillance cohort, PSA kinetics improves the prediction of surveillance biopsy outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.