Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29433510›Full record

SynthesisHealth and quality of life outcomes2018

Review and critical appraisal of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database and application of the MAPS statement.

Helen Dakin, Lucy Abel, Richéal Burns, Yaling Yang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Mapping the modified rankin scale (mRS) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) utilities.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Mapping from SIBDQ to EQ-5D-5L for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Trial
  9. Mapping of the acromegaly quality of life questionnaire to ED-5D-5L index score among patients with acromegaly.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Trial
  10. Predicting EuroQol (EQ-5D-5 L) health state utilities from functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire (FOSQ-10) scores.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helen DakinHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. helen.dakin@ndph.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3255-748X
Lucy AbelNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Richéal BurnsHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Yaling YangNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research CentreNational Institute for Health Research Oxford Diagnostic Evidence Cooperative (DEC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Health Economics Research Centre (HERC) Database of Mapping Studies was established in 2013, based on a systematic review of studies developing mapping algorithms predicting EQ-5D. The Mapping onto Preference-based measures reporting Standards (MAPS) statement was published in 2015 to improve reporting of mapping studies. We aimed to update the systematic review and assess the extent to which recently-published studies mapping condition-specific quality of life or clinical measures to the EQ-5D follow the guidelines published in the MAPS Reporting Statement.

methodsA published systematic review was updated using the original inclusion criteria to include studies published by December 2016. We included studies reporting novel algorithms mapping from any clinical measure or patient-reported quality of life measure to either the EQ-5D-3L or EQ-5D-5L. Titles and abstracts of all identified studies and the full text of papers published in 2016 were assessed against the MAPS checklist.

resultsThe systematic review identified 144 mapping studies reporting 190 algorithms mapping from 110 different source instruments to EQ-5D. Of the 17 studies published in 2016, nine (53%) had titles that followed the MAPS statement guidance, although only two (12%) had abstracts that fully addressed all MAPS items. When the full text of these papers was assessed against the complete MAPS checklist, only two studies (12%) were found to fulfil or partly fulfil all criteria. Of the 141 papers (across all years) that included abstracts, the items on the MAPS statement checklist that were fulfilled by the largest number of studies comprised having a structured abstract (95%) and describing target instruments (91%) and source instruments (88%).

conclusionsThe number of published mapping studies continues to increase. Our updated database provides a convenient way to identify mapping studies for use in cost-utility analysis. Most recent studies do not fully address all items on the MAPS checklist.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAlgorithmsChecklistCost-Benefit AnalysisDatabases, FactualGuidelines as TopicHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesCrosswalkingEQ-5DEuroQoLHealth-related quality of lifeMappingSystematic reviewUtility

Identifiers

PMID29433510
PMCPMC5810002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.