Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29433491›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Barriers to delivering mental health services in Georgia with an economic and financial focus: informing policy and acting on evidence.

Lela Sulaberidze, Stuart Green, Ivdity Chikovani, Maia Uchaneishvili, George Gotsadze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lela SulaberidzeCuratio International Foundation, 3 Kavsadze str, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia. l.sulaberidze@curatio.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3388-8731
Stuart GreenNational Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Research and Care, Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ivdity ChikovaniCuratio International Foundation, 3 Kavsadze str, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Maia UchaneishviliCuratio International Foundation, 3 Kavsadze str, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia.
George GotsadzeCuratio International Foundation, 3 Kavsadze str, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Curatio International Foundation · GENational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhilst there is recognition that the global burden of disease associated with mental health disorders is significant, the economic resources available, especially in Low and Middle Income Countries, are particularly scarce. Identifying the economic (system) and financial (individual) barriers to delivering mental health services and assessing the opportunities for reform can support the development of strategies for change.

methodsA mixed methods study was developed, which engaged with a range of stakeholders from mental health services, including key informants, service managers, healthcare professional and patients and their care-takers. Data generated from interviews and focus groups were analysed using an existing framework that outlines a range of economic and financial barriers to improving mental health practice. In addition, the study utilised health financing and programmatic data.

resultsThe analysis identified a variety of local economic barriers, including: the inhibition of the diversification of the mental health workforce and services due to inflexible resources; the variable and limited provision of services across the country; and the absence of mechanisms to assess the delivery and quality of existing services. The main financial barriers identified were related to out-of pocket payments for purchasing high quality medications and transportation to access mental health services.

conclusionsWhilst scarcity of financial resources exists in Georgia, as in many other countries, there are clear opportunities to improve the effectiveness of the current mental health programme. Addressing system-wide barriers could enable the delivery of services that aim to meet the needs of patients. The use of existing data to assess the implementation of the mental health programme offers opportunities to benchmark and improve services and to support the appropriate commissioning and reconfiguration of services.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPolicy MakingFemaleGeorgiaHealthcare FinancingHealth ExpendituresHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMental Health ServicesQualitative ResearchGeorgiaHealth policyHealth systemsLow-and-middle income countriesMental health

Identifiers

PMID29433491
PMCPMC5809973
OpenAlexW2802822246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.