Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29433479›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Tinnitus services in the United Kingdom: a survey of patient experiences.

Don McFerran, Derek J Hoare, Simon Carr, Jaydip Ray, David Stockdale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Psychological Comorbidities of Tinnitus.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Why Is There No Cure for Tinnitus?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Don McFerranColchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Otolaryngology, Essex County Hospital, Lexden Rd, Colchester, Essex, CO3 3NB, UK. donmcferran@aol.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4395-3405
Derek J HoareNIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Centre, Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NH1 5DU, UK.
Simon CarrRegional Department of Neurotology, Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK.
Jaydip RayRegional Department of Neurotology, Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK.
David StockdaleBritish Tinnitus Association, Ground Floor, Unit 5, Acorn Business Park, Woodseats Close, Sheffield, S8 0TB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTinnitus service provision in the United Kingdom has been investigated from the healthcare provider's perspective demonstrating considerable regional variation particularly regarding availability of psychological treatments. An audiological-based tinnitus service, however, was reportedly available for all tinnitus patients in the UK. The aim of the current study was to define and evaluate nationwide tinnitus healthcare services from the patients' viewpoint.

methodsSecondary analyses were performed on data from a 33-item questionnaire provided by the British Tinnitus Association. The questionnaire had been distributed via email and social media.

resultsResponses from 937 participants who had or had previously experienced tinnitus were analysed. All but one person had at some time consulted their GP. About one in five received medication in primary care. The majority were referred to secondary care, generally an ENT surgeon or audiovestibular physician; some were referred directly to audiological services. In secondary care the majority underwent audiometric testing and over half underwent MRI scanning. Drugs were prescribed less frequently in secondary care. About one third of patients were referred onwards from diagnostic services in secondary care to receive therapeutic interventions for tinnitus. Therapy was generally delivered by an audiologist or hearing therapist. Just under two fifths of people discharged from secondary care returned to their GP, with most returning within one year. Over a third of this group were re-referred to secondary care. Few patients saw a psychologist (2.6%) though some psychological treatments were delivered by appropriately trained audiologists. Negative counselling from healthcare professionals in both primary and secondary care settings was reported.

conclusionsAlthough the UK has developed a national service for patients with tinnitus many people find it difficult to access, being blocked at the primary care level or after secondary care diagnostic services. Many of those discharged from secondary care return to their GP within a short space of time and are re-referred to secondary care creating an unsatisfactory and expensive revolving-door pattern of healthcare. Despite psychological treatment modalities having the best evidence base for successful tinnitus management, only a minority of tinnitus patients ever get to meet a psychologist.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAgedCounselingFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSecondary Health CareTinnitusUnited KingdomAudiologyPrimary carePsychologyRevolving doorSecondary careTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID29433479
PMCPMC5809968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.