Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29433432›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Predictors of breast cancer cell types and their prognostic power in breast cancer patients.

Fan Wang, Zachariah Dohogne, Jin Yang, Yu Liu, Benjamin Soibam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Other Side of the Coin: May Androgens Have a Role in Breast Cancer Risk?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fan WangDepartment of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xian Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710061, People's Republic of China.
Zachariah DohogneComputer Science and Engineering Technology, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX, 77002, USA.
Jin YangDepartment of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xian Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710061, People's Republic of China.
Yu LiuDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
Benjamin SoibamComputer Science and Engineering Technology, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX, 77002, USA. soibamb@uhd.edu.

Funding

U.S. Department of Defense 68847-MA-REP/W911NF-16-1-0480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComprehensive understanding of intratumor heterogeneity requires identification of molecular markers, which are capable of differentiating different subpopulations and which also have clinical significance. One important tool that has been addressing this issue is single cell RNA-Sequencing (scRNASeq) that allows the quantification of expression profiles of transcripts in individual cells in a population of cancer cells. Using the expression profiles from scRNASeq, current studies conduct analysis to group cells into different subpopulations using clustering algorithms. In this study, we explore scRNASeq cancer data from a different perspective. We focus on scRNASeq data originating from cancer cells pertaining to a particular cancer type, where the cell type or the subpopulation to which each cell belongs is known. We investigate if the "cell type" of a cancer cell can be predicted based on the expression profiles of a small set of transcripts.

resultsWe outline a predictive analytics pipeline to accurately predict 6 breast cancer cell types using single cell gene expression profiles. Instead of building predictive models using the complete human transcripts, the pipeline first eliminates predictors with low expression and low variance. A multinomial penalized logistic regression further reduces the size of the predictors to only 308, out of which 34 are long non-coding RNAs. Tuning of predictive models shows support vector machines and neural networks as the most accurate models achieving close to 98% prediction accuracies. We also find that mixture of protein coding genes and long non-coding RNAs are better predictors compared to when the two sets of transcripts are treated separately. A signature risk score originating from 65 protein coding genes and 5 lncRNA predictors is associated with prognostic survival of TCGA breast cancer patients. This association was maintained when the risk scores were generated using 65 PCGs and 5 lncRNA separately. We further show that predictors restricted to a particular cell type serve as better prognostic markers for the respective patient subtype.

conclusionOur results show that in general, the breast cancer cell type predictors are also associated with patient survivability and hence have clinical significance.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerHER2 positiveLogistic regressionSingle cell sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29433432
PMCPMC5809864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.