Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29432780›Full record

ReviewProgress in biophysics and molecular biology2018

How mechanical forces shape the developing eye.

Hadi S Hosseini, Larry A Taber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Mouse Retinal Organoid Growth and Maintenance in Longer-Term Culture.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hadi S HosseiniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA; Department of Physics, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Larry A TaberDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA. Electronic address: lat@wustl.edu.

Funding

MECHANICS OF EARLY BRAIN AND EYE DEVELOPMENTR01NS070918 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TABER, LARRY A · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the vertebrate embryo, the eyes develop from optic vesicles that grow laterally outward from the brain tube and contact the overlying surface ectoderm. Within the region of contact, each optic vesicle and the surface ectoderm thicken to form placodes, which then invaginate to create the optic cup and lens pit, respectively. Eventually, the optic cup becomes the retina, while the lens pit closes to form the lens vesicle. Here, we review current hypotheses for the physical mechanisms that create these structures and present novel three-dimensional computer (finite-element) models to illustrate the plausibility and limitations of these hypotheses. Taken together, experimental and numerical results suggest that the driving forces for early eye morphogenesis are generated mainly by differential growth, actomyosin contraction, and regional apoptosis, with morphology mediated by physical constraints provided by adjacent tissues and extracellular matrix. While these studies offer new insight into the mechanics of eye development, future work is needed to better understand how these mechanisms are regulated to precisely control the shape of the eye.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaEyeHumansLens, CrystallineBiomechanicsComputational modelLensMorphogenesisOptic cupOptic vesicle

Identifiers

PMID29432780
PMCPMC6085168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.