Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29432771›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology2018

The relationships between faecal egg counts and gut microbial composition in UK Thoroughbreds infected by cyathostomins.

L E Peachey, R A Molena, T P Jenkins, A Di Cesare, D Traversa, J E Hodgkinson, C Cantacessi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

L E PeacheyDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, CB3 0ES, United Kingdom. Electronic address: lep41@cam.ac.uk.
R A MolenaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, CB3 0ES, United Kingdom.
T P JenkinsDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, CB3 0ES, United Kingdom.
A Di CesareFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, 64100, Italy.
D TraversaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, 64100, Italy.
J E HodgkinsonDepartment of Infection Biology, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Neston CH64 7TE, United Kingdom.
C CantacessiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, CB3 0ES, United Kingdom. Electronic address: cc779@cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Teramo · ITUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of evidence, particularly in humans and rodents, supports the existence of a complex network of interactions occurring between gastrointestinal (GI) helminth parasites and the gut commensal bacteria, with substantial effects on both host immunity and metabolic potential. However, little is known of the fundamental biology of such interactions in other animal species; nonetheless, given the considerable economic losses associated with GI parasites, particularly in livestock and equines, as well as the global threat of emerging anthelmintic resistance, further explorations of the complexities of host-helminth-microbiota interactions in these species are needed. This study characterises the composition of the equine gut commensal flora associated with the presence, in faecal samples, of low (Clow) and high (Chigh) numbers of eggs of an important group of GI parasites (i.e. the cyathostomins), prior to and following anthelmintic treatment. High-throughput sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons and associated bioinformatics and statistical analyses of sequence data revealed strong clustering according to faecal egg counts (P = 0.003). A trend towards increased populations of Methanomicrobia (class) and Dehalobacterium (genus) was observed in Clow in comparison with Chigh. Anthelmintic treatment in Chigh was associated with a significant reduction of the bacterial Phylum TM7 14 days post-ivermectin administration, as well as a transient expansion of Adlercreutzia spp. at 2 days post-treatment. This study provides a first known insight into the discovery of the intimate mechanisms governing host-parasite-microbiota interactions in equines, and sets a basis for the development of novel, biology-based intervention strategies against equine GI helminths based on the manipulation of the commensal gut flora.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthelminticsFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHorse DiseasesHorsesIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticIvermectinMacrolidesParasite Egg CountStrongylida InfectionsStrongyloideaUnited KingdomAnthelminticsIvermectinMacrolidesmoxidectin16S rRNA sequencingAdlercreutziaCyathostominsHelminth-microbiota interactionsMethanomicrobiaThoroughbred horsesTM7

Identifiers

PMID29432771
PMCPMC5946844
OpenAlexW2785607166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.