Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29432719›Full record

SynthesisContraception2018

A systematic review of contraceptive continuation among women living with HIV.

Catherine S Todd, Tracy C Anderman, Sarah Long, Landon Myer, Linda-Gail Bekker, Gregory A Petro, Heidi E Jones

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Contraception, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catherine S ToddReproductive, Maternal, Newborn, & Child Health Division, FHI360, 359 Blackwell Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701, USA. Electronic address: ctodd@fhi360.org.
Tracy C AndermanDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, City University of New York School of Public Health, 55 W 125(th) St, New York, NY 10027, USA. Electronic address: tracy.anderman@gmail.com.
Sarah LongReproductive, Maternal, Newborn, & Child Health Division, FHI360, 359 Blackwell Street, Suite 200, Durham, NC 27701, USA. Electronic address: smullins@fhi360.org.
Landon MyerDivision of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: landon.myer@uct.ac.za.
Linda-Gail BekkerDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute for Infectious Diseases & Molecular Medicine and Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: Linda-Gail.Bekker@hiv-research.org.za.
Gregory A PetroDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Cape Town & New Somerset Hospital, Lower Portswood Road, Green Point, 8001, Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: grepetro@westerncape.gov.za.
Heidi E JonesDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, City University of New York School of Public Health, 55 W 125(th) St, New York, NY 10027, USA. Electronic address: Heidi.Jones@sph.cuny.edu.

Funding

Safety and Acceptability of Two IUDs among Cape Town HIV-positive Women: A RCTR01HD071804 · NICHD · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI MYER, BENJAMIN LANDON, TODD, CATHERINE SUZANNE · 2012 to 2017
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen living with HIV (WLHIV) experience high rates of unmet contraceptive need and unintended pregnancy. Contraceptive method-specific continuation rates and associated factors are critical for guiding providers tasked with both reproductive health (RH) and HIV care. We conducted this systematic review to determine whether contraceptive continuation rates differ between WLHIV and uninfected women and, for WLHIV, whether differences are impacted by method type, antiretroviral therapy use or other factors.

methodsWe searched Ovid MEDLINE, POPLINE and PubMed.gov for studies published between January 1, 2000, and August 31, 2016. Inclusion criteria comprised prospective data of WLHIV, nonbarrier method continuation as an outcome measure, and recorded method switching and/or discontinuation.

resultsOf 939 citations screened, 22 articles from 18 studies were eligible. For studies with comparator groups, data quality was moderate overall based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment scales. Of four studies comparing women by HIV serostatus, two showed higher rates of contraceptive continuation among WLHIV versus uninfected women, while two others detected lower continuation rates for the same comparison. Generally, baseline method continuation exceeded 60% for studies with >12months of follow-up. Studies providing contraception had higher continuation rates than studies not providing contraception, while women allocated to contraceptive methods in trials had similar continuation rates to those choosing contraceptive methods. Across all studies, continuation rates differed by method and context, with the copper intrauterine device showing greatest variability between sites (51%-91% continuation rates at ≥12months). Implant continuation rates were ≥86%, though use was low relative to other methods and limited to few studes.

conclusionsContraceptive continuation among WLHIV differs by method and context. More longitudinal studies with contraceptive continuation as a measured outcome following ≥12months are needed to strengthen integration of RH and HIV care.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansContraceptive continuationContraceptive method switchingHIVLong-acting reversible contraceptionReproductive health

Identifiers

PMID29432719
PMCPMC7153688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.