Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29432554›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2018

Measuring care transitions in Sweden: validation of the care transitions measure.

Maria Flink, Mesfin Tessma, Milada Cvancarova Småstuen, Marléne Lindblad, Eric A Coleman, Mirjam Ekstedt

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Feasibility, Fidelity and Acceptability of a Person-Centred Care Transition Support Intervention for Stroke Survivors: A Non-Randomised Controlled Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria FlinkDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägaen 18A, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Mesfin TessmaDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägaen 18A, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Milada Cvancarova SmåstuenHiOA, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Pilestredet 32, Oslo, Norway.
Marléne LindbladDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägaen 18A, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Eric A ColemanDivision of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, 13199 East Montview Blvd., Suite 400 Campus, Box: F480 Aurora, CO 80045-7201, USA.
Mirjam EkstedtDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägaen 18A, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo translate and assess the validity and reliability of the original American Care Transitions Measure, both the 15-item and the shortened 3-item versions, in a sample of people in transition from hospital to home within Sweden.

designTranslation of survey items, evaluation of psychometric properties.

settingTen surgical and medical wards at five hospitals in Sweden.

participantsPatients discharged from surgical and medical wards.

main outcome measurePsychometric properties of the Swedish versions of the 15-item (CTM-15) and the 3-item (CTM-3) Care Transition Measure.

resultsWe compared the fit of nine models among a sample of 194 Swedish patients. Cronbach's alpha was 0.946 for CTM-15 and 0.74 for CTM-3. The model indices for CTM-15 and CTM-3 were strongly indicative of inferior goodness-of-fit between the hypothesized one-factor model and the sample data. A multidimensional three-factor model revealed a better fit compared with CTM-15 and CTM-3 one factor models. The one-factor solution, representing 4 items (CTM-4), showed an acceptable fit of the data, and was far superior to the one-factor CTM-15 and CTM-3 and the three-factor multidimensional models. The Cronbach's alpha for CTM-4 was 0.85.

conclusionsCTM-15 with multidimensional three-factor model was a better model than both CTM-15 and CTM-3 one-factor models. CTM-4 is a valid and reliable measure of care transfer among patients in medical and surgical wards in Sweden. It seems the Swedish CTM is best represented by the short Swedish version (CTM-4) unidimensional construct.

Indexed as

PsychometricsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Care SurveysHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient TransferSwedenTranslating

Identifiers

PMID29432554
PMCPMC5928451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.