Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29432552›Full record

ArticleInternational health2018

Routine immunization in Pakistan: comparison of multiple data sources and identification of factors associated with vaccination.

Hafsa Imran, Dania Raja, Nicholas C Grassly, M Zubair Wadood, Rana M Safdar, Kathleen M O'Reilly

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hafsa ImranMRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, St Mary's Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dania RajaMRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, St Mary's Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas C GrasslyMRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, St Mary's Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK.
M Zubair WadoodWorld Health Organization, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Rana M SafdarNational Emergency Operation Centre, Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Kathleen M O'ReillyMRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, St Mary's Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBMinistry of National Health Services Regulation and Coordination · PKWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PK

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J014362/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Within Pakistan, estimates of vaccination coverage with the pentavalent vaccine, oral polio vaccine (OPV) and measles vaccine (MV) in 2011 were reported to be 74%, 75% and 53%, respectively. These national estimates may mask regional variation. The reasons for this variation have not been explored. Methods: Data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) for Balochistan and Punjab (2010-2011) are analysed to examine factors associated with receiving three or more doses of the pentavalent vaccine and one or more MVs using regression modelling. Pentavalent and OPV estimates from the MICS were compared to vaccine dose histories from surveillance for acute flaccid paralysis (AFP; poliomyelitis) to ascertain agreement. Results: Adjusted coverage of children 12-23 months of age were estimated to be 16.0%, 75.5% and 34.2% in Balochistan and 58.0%, 87.7% and 72.6% in Punjab for the pentavalent vaccine, OPV and MV, respectively. Maternal education, healthcare utilization and wealth were associated with receiving the pentavalent vaccine and the MV. There was a strong correlation of district estimates of vaccination coverage between AFP and MICS data, but AFP estimates of pentavalent coverage in Punjab were biased toward higher values. Conclusions: National estimates mask variation and estimates from individual surveys should be considered alongside other estimates. The development of strategies targeted towards poorly educated parents within low-wealth quintiles that may not typically access healthcare could improve vaccination rates.

Indexed as

Health Care SurveysHumansInfantMeasles VaccinePakistanPoliovirus Vaccine, OralSocioeconomic FactorsVaccination CoverageVaccinesMeasles VaccinePoliovirus Vaccine, OralVaccines

Identifiers

PMID29432552
PMCPMC5856161
OpenAlexW2789298227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.