Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29432520›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2018

CRootBox: a structural-functional modelling framework for root systems.

Andrea Schnepf, Daniel Leitner, Magdalena Landl, Guillaume Lobet, Trung Hieu Mai, Shehan Morandage, Cheng Sheng, Mirjam Zörner, Jan Vanderborght, Harry Vereecken

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
25.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Towards modelling emergence in plant systems.Quantitative plant biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea SchnepfForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.
Daniel LeitnerSimulationswerkstatt, Ortmayrstrasse, Leonding, Austria.
Magdalena LandlForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.
Guillaume LobetForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.
Trung Hieu MaiForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.
Shehan MorandageForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.
Cheng ShengForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.
Mirjam ZörnerForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.
Jan VanderborghtForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.
Harry VereeckenForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Root architecture development determines the sites in soil where roots provide input of carbon and take up water and solutes. However, root architecture is difficult to determine experimentally when grown in opaque soil. Thus, root architecture models have been widely used and been further developed into functional-structural models that simulate the fate of water and solutes in the soil-root system. The root architecture model CRootBox presented here is a flexible framework to model root architecture and its interactions with static and dynamic soil environments. Methods: CRootBox is a C++-based root architecture model with Python binding, so that CRootBox can be included via a shared library into any Python code. Output formats include VTP, DGF, RSML and a plain text file containing coordinates of root nodes. Furthermore, a database of published root architecture parameters was created. The capabilities of CRootBox for the unconfined growth of single root systems, as well as the different parameter sets, are highlighted in a freely available web application. Key results: The capabilities of CRootBox are demonstrated through five different cases: (1) free growth of individual root systems; (2) growth of root systems in containers as a way to mimic experimental setups; (3) field-scale simulation; (4) root growth as affected by heterogeneous, static soil conditions; and (5) coupling CRootBox with code from the book Soil physics with Python to dynamically compute water flow in soil, root water uptake and water flow inside roots. Conclusions: CRootBox is a fast and flexible functional-structural root model that is based on state-of-the-art computational science methods. Its aim is to facilitate modelling of root responses to environmental conditions as well as the impact of roots on soil. In the future, this approach will be extended to the above-ground part of the plant.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSoftwareBiological TransportComputer SimulationPhenotypePlant RootsSoilWaterSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID29432520
PMCPMC5906965
OpenAlexW2951984774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.