ArticleAnnals of botany2018
CRootBox: a structural-functional modelling framework for root systems.
Article in Annals of botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 168 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiological and morphological drivers of early-spring vigor in warm-climate crops under suboptimal temperatures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Technological advances in imaging and modelling of leaf structural traits: a review of heat stress in wheat.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- A vision language model for generating XML-based organ-level plant architecture representations of cowpea from simulated images.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Soybean root elongation in relation to water and mechanical stresses in intact and disturbed structures of an Oxisol.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Beyond efficiency: The multi-scale architecture of robust water transport in plants.Quantitative plant biology · 2026Review
- Root system architecture reorganization under decreasing soil phosphorus lowers root system conductance of Zea mays.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Multiscale Mathematical Modeling in Systems Biology: A Framework to Boost Plant Synthetic Biology.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Seedling root system adaptation to water availability during maize domestication and global expansion.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- Review
- Plant microphenotype: from innovative imaging to computational analysis.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Root phenotypes for improved nitrogen capture.Plant and soil · 2024Review
- A Field-to-Parameter Pipeline for Analyzing and Simulating Root System Architecture of Woody Perennials: Application to Grapevine Rootstocks.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- 3D U-Net Segmentation Improves Root System Reconstruction from 3D MRI Images in Automated and Manual Virtual Reality Work Flows.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Modeling the effects of strigolactone levels on maize root system architecture.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Towards modelling emergence in plant systems.Quantitative plant biology · 2023Article
- Perennial grass root system specializes for multiple resource acquisitions with differential elongation and branching patterns.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Towards grapevine root architectural models to adapt viticulture to drought.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Tapping into the plasticity of plant architecture for increased stress resilience.F1000Research · 2023Review
- Editorial: Benchmarking 3D-Models of Root Growth, Architecture and Functioning.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Simulating Root Growth as a Function of Soil Strength and Yield With a Field-Scale Crop Model Coupled With a 3D Architectural Root Model.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Root architecture development determines the sites in soil where roots provide input of carbon and take up water and solutes. However, root architecture is difficult to determine experimentally when grown in opaque soil. Thus, root architecture models have been widely used and been further developed into functional-structural models that simulate the fate of water and solutes in the soil-root system. The root architecture model CRootBox presented here is a flexible framework to model root architecture and its interactions with static and dynamic soil environments. Methods: CRootBox is a C++-based root architecture model with Python binding, so that CRootBox can be included via a shared library into any Python code. Output formats include VTP, DGF, RSML and a plain text file containing coordinates of root nodes. Furthermore, a database of published root architecture parameters was created. The capabilities of CRootBox for the unconfined growth of single root systems, as well as the different parameter sets, are highlighted in a freely available web application. Key results: The capabilities of CRootBox are demonstrated through five different cases: (1) free growth of individual root systems; (2) growth of root systems in containers as a way to mimic experimental setups; (3) field-scale simulation; (4) root growth as affected by heterogeneous, static soil conditions; and (5) coupling CRootBox with code from the book Soil physics with Python to dynamically compute water flow in soil, root water uptake and water flow inside roots. Conclusions: CRootBox is a fast and flexible functional-structural root model that is based on state-of-the-art computational science methods. Its aim is to facilitate modelling of root responses to environmental conditions as well as the impact of roots on soil. In the future, this approach will be extended to the above-ground part of the plant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.