Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29432419›Full record

SynthesisPLoS genetics2018

An efficient Bayesian meta-analysis approach for studying cross-phenotype genetic associations.

Arunabha Majumdar, Tanushree Haldar, Sourabh Bhattacharya, John S Witte

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Bayesian clustering with uncertain data.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Arunabha MajumdarDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Tanushree HaldarInstitute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Sourabh BhattacharyaInterdisciplinary Statistical Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India.
John S WitteDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
University of California, San Francisco · USIndian Statistical Institute · IN

Funding

Training in Molecular& Genetic Epidemiology of CancerR25CA112355 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WITTE, JOHN S. · 2005 to 2018
$6.5M
Genetic Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer Risk and ProgressionR01CA088164 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VAN DEN EEDEN, STEPHEN K., WITTE, JOHN S. · 2000 to 2015
$6.1M
Genome-wide Pleiotropy Scan across Multiple CancersR01CA201358 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRAFF, REBECCA ELIZABETH, SAKODA, LORI · 2016 to 2019
$2.5M
Lifespan Psychosocial Profiles and Biological Pathways to Bone StrengthR01AG033067 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CRANDALL, CAROLYN JANET, KARLAMANGLA, ARUN S · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA088164NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201358NCI NIH HHS R25 CA112355NIA NIH HHS R01 AG033067NIH HHS R01CA201358NIH HHS R25CA112355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simultaneous analysis of genetic associations with multiple phenotypes may reveal shared genetic susceptibility across traits (pleiotropy). For a locus exhibiting overall pleiotropy, it is important to identify which specific traits underlie this association. We propose a Bayesian meta-analysis approach (termed CPBayes) that uses summary-level data across multiple phenotypes to simultaneously measure the evidence of aggregate-level pleiotropic association and estimate an optimal subset of traits associated with the risk locus. This method uses a unified Bayesian statistical framework based on a spike and slab prior. CPBayes performs a fully Bayesian analysis by employing the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique Gibbs sampling. It takes into account heterogeneity in the size and direction of the genetic effects across traits. It can be applied to both cohort data and separate studies of multiple traits having overlapping or non-overlapping subjects. Simulations show that CPBayes can produce higher accuracy in the selection of associated traits underlying a pleiotropic signal than the subset-based meta-analysis ASSET. We used CPBayes to undertake a genome-wide pleiotropic association study of 22 traits in the large Kaiser GERA cohort and detected six independent pleiotropic loci associated with at least two phenotypes. This includes a locus at chromosomal region 1q24.2 which exhibits an association simultaneously with the risk of five different diseases: Dermatophytosis, Hemorrhoids, Iron Deficiency, Osteoporosis and Peripheral Vascular Disease. We provide an R-package 'CPBayes' implementing the proposed method.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremGenetic Predisposition to DiseasePhenotypeCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesGenetic Association StudiesHumansMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo Method

Identifiers

PMID29432419
PMCPMC5825176
OpenAlexW2952892633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.