Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29432074›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse2018

An opioid overdose curriculum for medical residents: Impact on naloxone prescribing, knowledge, and attitudes.

Jessica L Taylor, Alison B Rapoport, Christopher F Rowley, Kenneth J Mukamal, Wendy Stead

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Rapid Naloxone Administration Workshop for Health Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica L Taylora Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Alison B Rapoportb Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Christopher F Rowleyb Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Kenneth J Mukamalc General Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Wendy Steadb Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBoston Medical Center · US

Funding

Clinical Addiction Research and Education ProgramR25DA013582 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI JEFFREY H. SAMET, Alexander Yale Walley · 2001 to 2026
$8.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA013582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite escalating opioid overdose death rates, addiction medicine is underrepresented in residency curricula. Providing naloxone to at-risk patients, relatives, and first responders reduces overdose deaths, but rates of naloxone prescribing remain low. The goal of this study is to examine the impact of a brief curricular intervention for internal medicine residents on naloxone prescribing rates, knowledge, and attitudes.

methodsInternal medicine residents (N = 160) at an urban, tertiary care medical center received two 1-hour didactic sessions addressing overdose prevention, including intranasal naloxone. The number of naloxone prescriptions generated by residents was compared to faculty, who received no similar intervention, in the 3-month periods before and after the curriculum. Resident knowledge and attitudes, as assessed by pre- and post-intervention surveys, were compared.

resultsThe resident naloxone prescribing rate increased from 420 to 1270 per 100,000 inpatient discharges (P = .01) and from 0 to 370 per 100,000 ambulatory visits (P < .001) post-intervention. Similar increases were not observed among inpatient faculty, whose prescribing rate decreased from 1150 to 880 per 100,000 discharges (P = .08), or among outpatient faculty, whose rate increased from 30 to 180 per 100,000 ambulatory visits (P < .001) but was lower than the post-intervention resident rate (P = .01). Residents demonstrated high baseline knowledge about naloxone, but just 13% agreed that they were adequately trained to prescribe pre-intervention. Post-intervention, residents were more likely to agree that they were adequately trained to prescribe (Likert mean 2.5 vs. 3.9, P < .001), to agree that treating addiction is rewarding (Likert mean 2.9 vs. 3.3, P = .03), and to attain a perfect score on the knowledge composite (57% vs. 33%, P = .05).

conclusionsA brief curricular intervention improved resident knowledge and attitudes regarding intranasal naloxone for opioid overdose reversal and significantly increased prescribing rates.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceCurriculumInternship and ResidencyAdministration, IntranasalAnalgesics, OpioidDrug OverdoseEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Analgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsCurriculummedical educationnaloxoneopioid use disorderoverdosesubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID29432074
PMCPMC8916048
OpenAlexW2789804345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.