Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29431871›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2018

Immunoassay methods used in clinical studies for the detection of anti-drug antibodies to adalimumab and infliximab.

B Gorovits, D J Baltrukonis, I Bhattacharya, M A Birchler, D Finco, D Sikkema, M S Vincent, S Lula, L Marshall, T P Hickling

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B GorovitsPfizer, Andover, MA, USA.
D J BaltrukonisPfizer, Groton, CT, USA.
I BhattacharyaPfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
M A BirchlerGlaxoSmithKline BioPharmaceuticals, Upper Merion, PA, USA.
D FincoPfizer, Groton, CT, USA.
D SikkemaQuanterix Corporation, Lexington, MA, USA.
M S VincentPfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
S LulaEnvision Pharma Group, London, UK.
L MarshallPfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA.
T P HicklingPfizer, Andover, MA, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USQuanterix (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the assay formats used to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in clinical studies of the anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibodies adalimumab and infliximab in chronic inflammatory disease and their potential impact on pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes. Using findings of a recent systematic literature review of the immunogenicity of 11 biological/biosimilar agents, we conducted an ancillary qualitative review of a subset of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of the monoclonal antibodies against anti-TNF factor adalimumab and infliximab. Among studies of adalimumab and infliximab, the immunoassay method used to detect antibodies was reported in 91 of 111 (82%) and 154 of 206 (75%) adalimumab and infliximab studies, respectively. In most adalimumab and infliximab studies, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or radioimmunoassay was used [85 of 91 (93%) and 134 of 154 (87%), respectively]. ADA incidence varied widely among assays and inflammatory diseases (adalimumab, 0-87%; infliximab, 0-79%). Pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes were only reported for ADA-positive patients in 38 of 91 (42%) and 61 of 154 (40%) adalimumab and infliximab studies, respectively. Regardless of assay format or biological used, ADA formation was associated with lower serum concentrations, reduced efficacy and elevated rates of infusion-related reactions. Consistent with previous recommendations to improve interpretation of immunogenicity data for biologicals, greater consistency in reporting of assay methods and clinical consequences of ADA formation may prove useful. Additional standardization in immunogenicity testing and reporting, application of modern, robust assays that satisfy current regulatory expectations and implementation of international standards for marketed products may help to improve our understanding of the impact of immunogenicity to biologics.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAntibodiesAntirheumatic AgentsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansInfliximabRadioimmunoassayTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAdalimumabAntibodiesAntirheumatic AgentsInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaadalimumabanti-drug antibodyanti-tumour necrosis factor monoclonal antibodyimmunoassayinfliximab

Identifiers

PMID29431871
PMCPMC5980437
OpenAlexW2791731545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.