Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29431751›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2018

Rapid flow in multilayer microfluidic paper-based analytical devices.

Robert B Channon, Michael P Nguyen, Alexis G Scorzelli, Elijah M Henry, John Volckens, David S Dandy, Charles S Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical evaluation of patterned dried plasma spot cards to support quantification of HIV viral load and reflexive genotyping.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Lab-on-a-Chip Devices for Point-of-Care Medical Diagnostics.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert B ChannonDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. chuck.henry@colostate.edu.
Michael P Nguyen
Alexis G Scorzelli
Elijah M Henry
John Volckens
David S Dandy
Charles S Henry

Funding

A New Paradigm for Workplace Air Sampling and Cost-Effective Exposure AssessmentR01OH010662 · OH · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY, CHARLES S, VOLCKENS, JOHN · 2015 to 2018
$2.0M
ACL HHS R01OH010662NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH010662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) are a versatile and inexpensive point-of-care (POC) technology, but their widespread adoption has been limited by slow flow rates and the inability to carry out complex in field analytical measurements. In the present work, we investigate multilayer μPADs as a means to generate enhanced flow rates within self-pumping paper devices. Through optical and electrochemical measurements, the fluid dynamics are investigated and compared to established flow theories within μPADs. We demonstrate a ∼145-fold increase in flow rate (velocity = 1.56 cm s

Indexed as

PaperPoint-of-Care SystemsCadmiumElectrochemical TechniquesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesOptical ImagingCadmium

Identifiers

PMID29431751
PMCPMC7071557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.