ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2017
The upgoing thumb sign: An interobserver/intraobserver reliability study.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe upgoing thumb sign as a subtle clinical finding of upper motor neuron involvement has been frequently reported in patients with TIAs and minor strokes. This study was designed to show the method of examination and interpretation and the interobserver/intraobserver reliability.
methodsThe thumb sign was elicited in TIA/minor strokes or stroke mimics. After obtaining the participant's permission, the examinations were recorded. Two independent neurologists reviewed all patients for the possibility of an upgoing thumb sign. After 1 hour education about the definition of an upgoing thumb sign to a group of stroke fellows, nurse practitioners, and a research secretary, the videos were reviewed and the participants rated the thumb sign independently. The intraobserver reliability was assessed after 3 months by rating the same videos.
resultsThe interobserver reliability among 9 raters showed an overall agreement of 0.83 and fixed-marginal kappa of 0.66. The same videos were reviewed by the observers after 3 months with a similar level of agreement (percent of overall agreement 0.84, fixed-marginal kappa 0.66) and a substantial to almost perfect level of intraobserver concordance (mean 0.86; SD 0.08; median 0.90; interquartile range 25-75, 0.8, 0.95).
conclusionsThe upgoing thumb sign is a subtle upper limb neurologic finding, with a high level of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. The test is easy to perform and can be interpreted accurately.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.