ArticleCritical reviews in biomedical engineering2016
Computed Tomography Image Matching in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in Critical reviews in biomedical engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disease activity in COPD: time to make imaging biomarkers a PET project?ERJ open research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), characterized by progressive airflow obstruction due to the combined effects of emphysema and small airways disease, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The complex link between emphysema and airways disease is associated with significant heterogeneity in clinical presentation. Spirometry is the current gold standard for diagnosis and stratification of the severity of airflow obstruction in COPD. Although spirometry is simple to use, it does not enable the separation of emphysema from airways disease. Computed tomography (CT), on the other hand, provides the anatomic localization of disease and has been increasingly used to phenotype COPD. The majority of current CT measures are extracted from a single-volume CT scan and although useful to characterize emphysema and airways disease, they do not link structural and functional abnormalities. Alternatively, CT image matching combines information from both inspiratory and expiratory CT scans, thus enabling determination of functional changes such as regional ventilation and mechanical properties of the lung. In this review, we discuss recent applications of CT image matching that provide clinically meaningful information beyond spirometry and single-volume CT scan measures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.