SynthesisGenetic epidemiology2018
A meta-analysis approach with filtering for identifying gene-level gene-environment interactions.
Synthesis in Genetic epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Variance-component-based meta-analysis of gene-environment interactions for rare variants.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Pooled it
- Gene-environment interactions in human health.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Decoding Cancer Risk: Understanding Gene-Environment Interactions in Cancer Development.Cureus · 2024Review
- Hereditary and breastfeeding factors are positively associated with the aetiology of mammary gland hyperplasia: a case-control study.International health · 2021Article
- Impact of Gene-Environment Interactions on Cancer Development.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a growing recognition that gene-environment interaction (G × E) plays a pivotal role in the development and progression of complex diseases. Despite a wealth of genetic data on various complex diseases/traits generated from association and sequencing studies, detecting G × E via genome-wide analysis remains challenging due to power issues. In genome-wide G × E studies, a common strategy to improve power is to first conduct a filtering test and retain only the genetic variants that pass the filtering step for subsequent G × E analyses. Two-stage, multistage, and unified tests have been proposed to jointly consider the filtering statistics in G × E tests. However, such G × E tests based on data from a single study may still be underpowered. Meanwhile, large-scale consortia have been formed to borrow strength across studies and populations. In this work, motivated by existing single-study G × E tests with filtering and the needs for meta-analysis G × E approaches based on consortia data, we propose a meta-analysis framework for detecting gene-based G × E effects, and introduce meta-analysis-based filtering statistics in the gene-level G × E tests. Simulations demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method-the ofGEM test. We apply the proposed tests to existing data from two breast cancer consortia to identify the genes harboring genetic variants with age-dependent penetrance (i.e., gene-age interaction effects). We develop an R software package ofGEM for the proposed meta-analysis tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.