Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29430604›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2018

Comparison of culture and broad-range polymerase chain reaction methods for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: analysis of joint fluid, periprosthetic tissue, and sonicated fluid.

Zida Huang, Qiqiao Wu, Xinyu Fang, Wenbo Li, Chaofan Zhang, Huiyi Zeng, Qijin Wang, Jianhua Lin, Wenming Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Spondylitis following bloodstream dissemination ofThe Journal of international medical research · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Zida HuangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China.
Qiqiao WuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China.
Xinyu FangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China.
Wenbo LiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China.
Chaofan ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China.
Huiyi ZengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China.
Qijin WangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China.
Jianhua LinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China.
Wenming ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China. zhangwm0591@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4563-3285
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study compared the diagnostic capabilities of culture and broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using joint fluid (JF), periprosthetic tissue (PT), and sonicated fluid (SF) for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

methodsSixty-seven subjects underwent knee or hip revision surgery, with 53 PJI and 14 aseptic failure (AF) cases included retrospectively. JF, PT, and SF samples were collected after a suspension of antibiotics more than two weeks, and culture and broad-range PCR were performed for all samples.

resultsThe sensitivities of SF culture (83.0%), JF-PCR (83.0%), and SF-PCR (84.9%) were similar (P > 0.05), but each was significantly more sensitive than JF culture (69.8%), PT culture (71.7%), and PT-PCR (34.0%) (P < 0.05). The specificities of JF culture, PT culture, SF culture, JF-PCR, PT-PCR, and SF-PCR were similar (100, 100, 85.7, 85.7, 100, and 78.6%, respectively) (P > 0.05). PCR was unable to accurately detect six polymicrobial infections and two fungal infections.

conclusionsSF culture, JF-PCR, and SF-PCR were more sensitive than JF culture, PT culture, and PT-PCR for diagnosing PJI among patients who have stopped taking antibiotics for two weeks or more. Compared with PCR methods, SF culture has the advantage of detecting polymicrobial or fungal infections. PT-PCR proved to be insufficiently sensitive for providing correct diagnoses.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthritis, InfectiousBacteriological TechniquesFemaleHip JointHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis-Related InfectionsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReoperationRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBroad-range PCRCulturePeriprosthetic joint infectionSonication

Identifiers

PMID29430604
OpenAlexW2794069527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.