ArticleeNeurologicalSci2016
Characterization of patients with ocular myasthenia gravis - A case series.
Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Myasthenia gravis-Gender aspects and family planning].Der Nervenarzt · 2024Review
- Low probability of myasthenia Gravis in patients presenting to neuro-ophthalmology clinic for evaluation of isolated ptosis.European journal of ophthalmology · 2023Review
- The Role of Thymoma and Thymic Hyperplasia as Prognostic Risk Factors for Secondary Generalisation in Adults with Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Narrative Review.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2023Article
- Paraneoplastic Syndromes in Neuro-Ophthalmology.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2022Article
- Acetylcholine receptor antibody positivity rate in ocular myasthenia gravis: a matter of age?Journal of neurology · 2021Article
- Controversies in Ocular Myasthenia Gravis.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) is sometimes difficult to diagnose and is probably both under-diagnosed and misdiagnosed. We studied the epidemiological parameters, relevant serology, electromyographic (EMG) findings, and the relationship between OMG and thymoma, thymus hyperplasia and other autoimmune disorders compared to generalized MG (GMG) in a case control study of 133 patients with MG (32 patients with OMG and 101 patients with GMG). The proportion of OMG among all MG patients was relatively high (24.1%). It affected more males than females and its onset was at an older age. Although anti-AChR Ab was detected in fewer OMG patients compared to GMG patients, the rate of positive serology in OMG patients was higher than previously reported. Male OMG patients had a higher positive serology rate than female OMG patients. OMG patients tended to have less supportive EMG evidence of neuromuscular disorder. Female OMG patients had higher rates of thymus hyperplasia and higher rates of other autoimmune disorders than males. Diagnosing MG in patients with solitary ocular manifestation may be difficult due to lower rates of paraclinic supportive tests. Awareness of the characteristics of OMG is important in order to avoid delayed or misdiagnosis of MG and to prevent avoidable iatrogenic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.