Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29430498›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2018

A Comparison between Single and Double Tourniquet Technique in Distal Upper Limb Orthopedic Surgeries with Intravenous Regional Anesthesia.

Mohammad Haghighi, Mohsen Mardani-Kivi, Ahmadreza Mirbolook, Samaneh Ghazanfar Tehran, Nasim Ashouri Saheli, Keyvan Hashemi-Motlagh, Khashayar Sahbe-Ekhtiari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad HaghighiAnesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Department, Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Anesthesiology Department, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Mohsen Mardani-KiviAnesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Department, Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Anesthesiology Department, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Ahmadreza MirbolookAnesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Department, Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Anesthesiology Department, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Samaneh Ghazanfar TehranAnesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Department, Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Anesthesiology Department, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Nasim Ashouri SaheliAnesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Department, Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Anesthesiology Department, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Keyvan Hashemi-MotlaghAnesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Department, Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Anesthesiology Department, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Khashayar Sahbe-EkhtiariAnesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Department, Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Orthopedic Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Anesthesiology Department, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have put an effort to minimize the tourniquet pain and complications after conventional double tourniquet intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). We expressed in our hypothesis that an upper arm single wide tourniquet (ST) may serve a better clinical efficacy rather than the conventional upper arm double tourniquet (DT) in distal upper extremity surgeries.

methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, 80 patients undergoing upper limb orthopedic surgeries were randomized into two groups. IVRA was administered using lidocaine in both groups. Tourniquet pain was recorded based on visual analogue scale (VAS). In case of pain (VAS>3) in the DT group, the proximal tourniquet was replaced with a distal tourniquet while fentanyl 50µg was injected in the ST group. The onset time of tourniquet pain, time to reach to maximum tourniquet pain and the amount of fentanyl consumption were compared between the two groups.

resultsNo significant difference was seen in demographic characteristics. The onset time of tourniquet pain (VAS=1) in the ST group (26.9±13.2 min) was longer than that of the DT group (13.8±4.8 min) (

conclusionIt seems that in upper limb orthopedic surgeries with less than 40-minute duration, a single tourniquet may serve as a proper alternative opposed to the conventional double tourniquet technique.

Indexed as

Bier blockOpioid consumptionOrthopedic surgeryRegional anesthesiaTourniquet pain

Identifiers

PMID29430498
PMCPMC5799603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.