Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29430379›Full record

Article3 Biotech2018

Genomic insights of aromatic hydrocarbon degrading

Jina Rajkumari, L Paikhomba Singha, Piyush Pandey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Application potential ofOpen life sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome-resolved analysis of Serratia marcescens strain SMTT infers niche specialization as a hydrocarbon-degrader.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  8. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jina RajkumariSoil and Environmental Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Assam University, Silchar, Assam 788011 India.
L Paikhomba SinghaSoil and Environmental Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Assam University, Silchar, Assam 788011 India.
Piyush PandeySoil and Environmental Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Assam University, Silchar, Assam 788011 India.
Assam University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research employs draft genome sequence data of

Indexed as

BiodegradationCleavage pathwayGenomeHeavy metalHydrocarbonsKlebsiella pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID29430379
PMCPMC5803133
OpenAlexW2786595022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.