Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29430375›Full record

Article3 Biotech2018

Complete genome sequence of

Long Chen, Wei Gu, Hai-Yan Xu, Gui-Lian Yang, Xiao-Feng Shan, Guang Chen, Chun-Feng Wang, Ai-Dong Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AFrontiers in fungal biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fermentation of NaHCOApplied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  9. Neuroendocrine-Immune Regulatory Network ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Suppression of Grape White Rot Caused byPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Review on Bacterial Contribution to Lignocellulose Breakdown into Useful Bio-Products.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Long Chen1College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 People's Republic of China.
Wei GuShandong BaoLai-LeeLai Bioengineering Co. Ltd., Tai'an, 271000 Shandong People's Republic of China.
Hai-Yan XuShandong BaoLai-LeeLai Bioengineering Co. Ltd., Tai'an, 271000 Shandong People's Republic of China.
Gui-Lian Yang1College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Feng Shan1College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 People's Republic of China.
Guang Chen3College of Life Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 People's Republic of China.
Chun-Feng Wang1College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 People's Republic of China.
Ai-Dong Qian1College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118 People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Agro-industrial wasteBacillus velezensis 157Complete genome sequencingEucommia ulmoidesLignocellulolytic enzyme activitiesSecondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID29430375
PMCPMC5801104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.