Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29430347›Full record

Article3 Biotech2018

Rajkuberan Chandrasekaran, Prabukumar Seetharaman, Muthukumar Krishnan, Sathishkumar Gnanasekar, Sivaramakrishnan Sivaperumal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Potential ectoparasiticide for dog and cat fleas, a combination ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Phytochemical Composition and Bioassay on IranianJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dengue Fever: Therapeutic Potential ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rajkuberan Chandrasekaran1Department of Biotechnology, School of Biotechnology, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu India.
Prabukumar Seetharaman1Department of Biotechnology, School of Biotechnology, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu India.
Muthukumar Krishnan3Department of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu India.
Sathishkumar Gnanasekar1Department of Biotechnology, School of Biotechnology, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu India.
Sivaramakrishnan Sivaperumal1Department of Biotechnology, School of Biotechnology, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu India.
Bharathidasan University · INKarpagam Academy of Higher Education · INNational Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study manifests the larvicidal efficacy of

Indexed as

Aedes aegyptiCarica papayaCulex quinquefasciatusLatexSilver nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID29430347
PMCPMC5796936
OpenAlexW2782988166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.