ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2018
Test-Retest Reproducibility of the Microperimeter MP3 With Fundus Image Tracking in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Macular Disease.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigated laser and aflibercept versus aflibercept monotherapy in treatment-naïve branch retinal vein occlusion: A 12-month randomized trial.Acta ophthalmologica · 2022Trial
- Retinal AAV8-RS1 Gene Therapy for X-Linked Retinoschisis: Initial Findings from a Phase I/IIa Trial by Intravitreal Delivery.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2018Trial
- Repeatability of Foveal Sensitivity Measured Using Adaptive Optics Microperimetry.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Test-Retest Repeatability of a Novel Photopic Microperimetry Approach in Patients with Geographic Atrophy.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- OCTA and microperimetry in Behçet's retinal vasculitis: subgroup analysis, structure-function correlation, and 12-month follow-up evaluation.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Preoperative OCT Biomarkers as Predictors of Postoperative Functional Outcome Assessed by Microperimetry After Inverted ILM Flap Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Normative prospective data on automatically quantified retinal morphology correlated to retinal function in healthy ageing eyes by two microperimetry devices.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
- Evaluation of changes in retinal light sensitivity thresholds in the early postoperative days after trabeculectomy using microperimetry.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and MP-3 Microperimeter in Patients With Glaucoma, Classified by Severity and Misalignment of Test Points.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the reproducibility of a deep learning algorithm for the prediction of retinal age.GeroScience · 2025Article
- Pericentral Scotometry Guided by Standard Perimetry Using Microperimetry in Glaucoma Patients.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Macular function measured by Nidek MP-3 microperimeter in normal Chinese individuals across age groups.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Parafoveal Microperimetric Retinal Sensitivity as a Key Parameter Associated with Vision Loss in Retinitis Pigmentosa.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Characterizing Retinal Sensitivity and Structure in Congenital Stationary Night Blindness: A Combined Microperimetry and OCT Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Visual Field Tests: A Narrative Review of Different Perimetric Methods.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Defining the structure-function relationship of specific lesions in early and advanced age-related macular degeneration.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Correlation between retinal sensitivity assessed by microperimetry and structural abnormalities on optical coherence tomography after successful epiretinal membrane surgery.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Article
- Inter and intradevice assessment of microperimetry testing in aging eyes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Microperimetric analysis of eyes after macular hole surgery with indocyanine green staining: a retrospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Normative data for macular perimetry using the MP-3 microperimeter in healthy individuals.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the test-retest reproducibility of a novel microperimeter with fundus image tracking (MP3, Nidek Co, Japan) in healthy subjects and patients with macular disease.
methodsTen healthy subjects and 20 patients suffering from range of macular diseases were included. After training measurements, two additional microperimetry measurements were scheduled. Test-retest reproducibility was assessed for mean retinal sensitivity, pointwise sensitivity, and deep scotoma size using the coefficient of repeatability and Bland-Altman diagrams. In addition, in a subgroup of patients microperimetry was compared with conventional perimetry.
resultsAverage differences in mean retinal sensitivity between the two study measurements were 0.26 ± 1.7 dB (median 0 dB; interquartile range [IQR] -1 to 1) for the healthy and 0.36 ± 2.5 dB (median 0 dB; IQR -1 to 2) for the macular patient group. Coefficients of repeatability for mean retinal sensitivity and pointwise retinal sensitivity were 1.2 and 3.3 dB for the healthy subjects and 1.6 and 5.0 dB for the macular disease patients, respectively. Absolute agreement in deep scotoma size between both study days was found in 79.9% of the test loci.
conclusionThe microperimeter MP3 shows an adequate test-retest reproducibility for mean retinal sensitivity, pointwise retinal sensitivity, and deep scotoma size in healthy subjects and patients suffering from macular disease. Furthermore, reproducibility of microperimetry is higher than conventional perimetry. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Reproducibility is an important measure for each diagnostic device. Especially in a clinical setting high reproducibility set the basis to achieve reliable results using the specific device. Therefore, assessment of the reproducibility is of eminent importance to interpret the findings of future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.