Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29430305›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2017

Nonsurgical Procedures for Keratoconus Management.

L Rico-Del-Viejo, M Garcia-Montero, J L Hernández-Verdejo, S García-Lázaro, F J Gómez-Sanz, A Lorente-Velázquez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of contact lens correction on wavefront aberrations and vision quality in keratoconus.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Keratoconus: imaging modalities and management.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Update on Contact Lens Treatment of KeratoconusTurkish journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Topographic and Biomechanical Changes after Application of Corneal Cross-Linking in Recurrent Keratoconus.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Visual acuity in patients with keratoconus: a comparison with matched regular myopic astigmatism.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Short-term visual outcome with sclerocorneal contact lens on irregular cornea.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L Rico-Del-ViejoDepartment of Optics II, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
M Garcia-MonteroDepartment of Optics II, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
J L Hernández-VerdejoDepartment of Optics II, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
S García-LázaroDepartment of Optics and Optometry and Vision, Faculty of Physics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
F J Gómez-SanzDepartment of Optics II, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
A Lorente-VelázquezDepartment of Optics II, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0380-5897
Instituto de Óptica "Daza de Valdés" · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the past 20 years' correction modalities for keratoconus and their visual outcomes and possible complications.

methodsA review of the published literature related to the visual outcomes and possible complications in the context of keratoconus management using nonsurgical procedures for the last 20 years (glasses and contact lenses) was performed. Original articles that reported the outcome of any correction modalities of keratoconus management were reviewed.

resultsThe most nonsurgical procedure used on keratoconus management is the contact lens fitting. Soft contact lenses and soft toric contact lenses, rigid gas-permeable contact lenses, piggyback contact lens system, hybrid contact lenses, and scleral and corneoscleral contact lenses form the contemporary range of available lens types for keratoconus management with contact lenses. All of them try to restore the vision, improve the quality of life, and delay surgical procedures in patients with this disease. Complications are derived from the intolerance of using contact lens, and the use of each depends on keratoconus severity.

conclusionsIn the context of nonsurgical procedures, the use of contact lenses for the management of keratoconic patients represents a good alternative to restore vision and improve the quality of live in this population.

Identifiers

PMID29430305
PMCPMC5753012
OpenAlexW2779880437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.