Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29430042›Full record

ArticleBiometrika2017

On two-stage estimation of structural instrumental variable models.

Byeong Yeob Choi, Jason P Fine, M Alan Brookhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrika, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Byeong Yeob ChoiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78229, U.S.A.choib@uthscsa.edu.
Jason P FineDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, 3103B McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, U.S.A.jfine@email.unc.edu.
M Alan BrookhartDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, 2105F McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, U.S.A.mabrook@email.unc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-stage least squares estimation is popular for structural equation models with unmeasured confounders. In such models, both the outcome and the exposure are assumed to follow linear models conditional on the measured confounders and instrumental variable, which is related to the outcome only via its relation with the exposure. We consider data where both the outcome and the exposure may be incompletely observed, with particular attention to the case where both are censored event times. A general class of two-stage minimum distance estimators is proposed that separately fits linear models for the outcome and exposure and then uses a minimum distance criterion based on the reduced-form model for the outcome to estimate the regression parameters of interest. An optimal minimum distance estimator is identified which may be superior to the usual two-stage least squares estimator with fully observed data. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed methods perform well with realistic sample sizes. Their practical utility is illustrated in a study of the comparative effectiveness of colon cancer treatments, where the effect of chemotherapy on censored survival times may be confounded with patient status.

Indexed as

Censored dataEndogeneityInstrumental variableResamplingUnmeasured confounder

Identifiers

PMID29430042
PMCPMC5793491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.