Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29429419›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2018

Altered fear processing in adolescents with a history of severe childhood maltreatment: an fMRI study.

H Hart, L Lim, M A Mehta, A Simmons, K A H Mirza, K Rubia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. TMS-fMRI Supports Roles for VLPFC and Downstream Regions in Cognitive Reappraisal.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The VLPFC-Engaged Voluntary Emotion Regulation: Combined TMS-fMRI Evidence for the Neural Circuit of Cognitive Reappraisal.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H HartDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,UK.
L LimDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,UK.
M A MehtaDepartment of Neuroimaging,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,London,UK.
A SimmonsNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley Foundation NHS Trust and King's College London,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,London,UK.
K A H MirzaSLAM NHS Trust,Kennington,London,UK.
K RubiaDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with a history of maltreatment suffer from altered emotion processing but the neural basis of this phenomenon is unknown. This pioneering functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study investigated the effects of severe childhood maltreatment on emotion processing while controlling for psychiatric conditions, medication and substance abuse.

methodTwenty medication-naive, substance abuse-free adolescents with a history of childhood abuse, 20 psychiatric control adolescents matched on psychiatric diagnoses but with no maltreatment and 27 healthy controls underwent a fMRI emotion discrimination task comprising fearful, angry, sad happy and neutral dynamic facial expressions.

resultsMaltreated participants responded faster to fearful expressions and demonstrated hyper-activation compared to healthy controls of classical fear-processing regions of ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex, which survived at a more lenient threshold relative to psychiatric controls. Functional connectivity analysis, furthermore, demonstrated reduced connectivity between left vmPFC and insula for fear in maltreated participants compared to both healthy and psychiatric controls.

conclusionsThe findings show that people who have experienced childhood maltreatment have enhanced fear perception, both at the behavioural and neurofunctional levels, associated with enhanced fear-related ventromedial fronto-cingulate activation and altered functional connectivity with associated limbic regions. Furthermore, the connectivity adaptations were specific to the maltreatment rather than to the developing psychiatric conditions, whilst the functional changes were only evident at trend level when compared to psychiatric controls, suggesting a continuum. The neurofunctional hypersensitivity of fear-processing networks may be due to childhood over-exposure to fear in people who have been abused.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdolescentAngerCase-Control StudiesChildChild AbuseFacial ExpressionFearFemaleGyrus CinguliHappinessHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexUnited KingdomChild abusechildhood maltreatmentfear processingfunctional connectivityinsulalimbicprefrontal

Identifiers

PMID29429419
PMCPMC6088776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.