Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29429412›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2018

Animal-assisted intervention in the ICU: a tool for humanization.

Megan M Hosey, Janice Jaskulski, Stephen T Wegener, Linda L Chlan, Dale M Needham

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Robotic Pet Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Development and Validation of the Healthcare Professional Humanization Scale (HUMAS) for Nursing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  14. The continuum of critical care.Critical care (London, England) · 2019
    Review
  15. Pediatric delirium in times of COVID-19.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva
    Article
  16. Perioperative pet presence: Bridging compassion and clinical safety.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Megan M HoseyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. hmegan1@jhmi.edu.
Janice JaskulskiDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stephen T WegenerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Linda L ChlanMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Dale M NeedhamOutcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Research Training in Rehabilitation for Brain Injury and Neurological DisabilityT32HD007414 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Amy J. Bastian · 1991 to 2026
$6.3M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Animal Assisted TherapyAnimalsAnxietyHumanismHumansIntensive Care UnitsPain ManagementSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID29429412
PMCPMC5808422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.