Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29429403›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2018

Comparison of the performance of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis.

Angelica Stranieri, Alessia Giordano, Saverio Paltrinieri, Chiara Giudice, Valentina Cannito, Stefania Lauzi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angelica StranieriDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Central Laboratory, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Alessia GiordanoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Central Laboratory, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Saverio PaltrinieriDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Central Laboratory, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7117-7987
Chiara GiudiceDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Central Laboratory, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Valentina CannitoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Central Laboratory, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Stefania LauziDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Central Laboratory, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the performance of clinicopathologic and molecular tests used in the antemortem diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). From 16 FIP and 14 non-FIP cats, we evaluated retrospectively the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs) of serum protein electrophoresis, α

Indexed as

AnimalsCase-Control StudiesCatsCell CountFeline Infectious PeritonitisRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityClinicopathologic testsfeline coronavirusfeline infectious peritonitislikelihood ratiosmolecular testsspike gene

Identifiers

PMID29429403
PMCPMC6505812
OpenAlexW2791108412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.