Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29428459›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2018

Next generation sequencing of HIV-1 protease in the PIVOT trial of protease inhibitor monotherapy.

David T Dunn, Wolfgang Stöhr, Alejandro Arenas-Pinto, Anna Tostevin, Jean L Mbisa, Nicholas I Paton, or the Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Ongoing Triple Therapy PIVOT Trial Team

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David T DunnMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK; Institute for Global Health, UCL, London, UK. Electronic address: d.dunn@ucl.ac.uk.
Wolfgang StöhrMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
Alejandro Arenas-PintoMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK; Institute for Global Health, UCL, London, UK.
Anna TostevinInstitute for Global Health, UCL, London, UK.
Jean L MbisaPublic Health England, London, UK.
Nicholas I PatonMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
or the Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Ongoing Triple Therapy PIVOT Trial Team

Funding

Department of Health 06/403/501Department of Health HTA/06/403/501Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PIVOT trial examined whether patients with suppressed viral load on combination antiretroviral therapy could be safely switched long-term to ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy. The main trial publication reported that only one of 296 patients allocated to PI monotherapy experienced a loss of drug options due to protease mutations (identified by local Sanger sequencing resistance tests) likely selected by study drug.

objectivesTo assess if we had missed low frequency mutations, using a more sensitive methodology. STUDY

designWe performed next generation sequencing (NGS) on all available frozen plasma samples with VL >1000 copies/ml from patients who were randomised to PI monotherapy. Assays were performed at Public Health England laboratories using a previously described method. Median coverage depth was 76,000 and the threshold for detection of minority variants was 2%. Drug susceptibility was predicted using the Stanford HIVdb algorithm.

results17 of 26 potential samples, all from different patients, were identified and successfully tested. The median viral load was 6780 copies/ml and the median time since randomisation was 43 weeks. NGS revealed previously unidentified minority variant protease mutations (G73D, I54T, L89V) in three samples, at frequencies ranging between 2% and 10%. None of these mutations predicted intermediate or high level resistance, the trial primary outcome. DISCUSSION: This report adds to the body of evidence that ritonavir-boosted PI monotherapy, when used as a switch strategy with prompt detection of viral load rebound and early re-introduction of combination therapy, rarely leads to the development of clinically important protease resistance mutations.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralEnglandHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV ProteaseHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansMutationRNA, ViralSequence Analysis, RNATreatment OutcomeViral LoadHIV ProteaseHIV Protease Inhibitorsp16 protease, Human immunodeficiency virus 1RNA, ViralHIVNGSProtease inhibitorResistance

Identifiers

PMID29428459
PMCPMC5861306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.