Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29428416›Full record

ArticleCell systems2018

GeneGini: Assessment via the Gini Coefficient of Reference "Housekeeping" Genes and Diverse Human Transporter Expression Profiles.

Steve O'Hagan, Marina Wright Muelas, Philip J Day, Emma Lundberg, Douglas B Kell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Role of solute carrier transporters in ovarian cancer (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Steve O'HaganSchool of Chemistry, 131, Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK; The Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131, Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK.
Marina Wright MuelasSchool of Chemistry, 131, Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK; The Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131, Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK.
Philip J DayThe Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131, Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK; Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Emma LundbergScience for Life Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), SE-17121 Solna, Sweden. Electronic address: emma.lundberg@scilifelab.se.
Douglas B KellSchool of Chemistry, 131, Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK; The Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131, Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK. Electronic address: dbk@manchester.ac.uk.
University of Manchester · GBKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P009042/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expression levels of SLC or ABC membrane transporter transcripts typically differ 100- to 10,000-fold between different tissues. The Gini coefficient characterizes such inequalities and here is used to describe the distribution of the expression of each transporter among different human tissues and cell lines. Many transporters exhibit extremely high Gini coefficients even for common substrates, indicating considerable specialization consistent with divergent evolution. The expression profiles of SLC transporters in different cell lines behave similarly, although Gini coefficients for ABC transporters tend to be larger in cell lines than in tissues, implying selection. Transporter genes are significantly more heterogeneously expressed than the members of most non-transporter gene classes. Transcripts with the stablest expression have a low Gini index and often differ significantly from the "housekeeping" genes commonly used for normalization in transcriptomics/qPCR studies. PCBP1 has a low Gini coefficient, is reasonably expressed, and is an excellent novel reference gene. The approach, referred to as GeneGini, provides rapid and simple characterization of expression-profile distributions and improved normalization of genome-wide expression-profiling data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGenes, EssentialGenes, RegulatorHumansMembrane Transport ProteinsSequence AnalysisSoftwareTranscriptomeATP-Binding Cassette TransportersMembrane Transport Proteinscell atlasdrug transportersGini indexhousekeeping genesHuman Protein AtlasSLCstissue specificitytranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID29428416
PMCPMC5840522
OpenAlexW2785531056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.