ArticleThe Science of the total environment2018
Field-based method for evaluating the annual maximum specific conductivity tolerated by freshwater invertebrates.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Novel Approach to Developing Thresholds for Total Dissolved Solids Using Standardized and Experimental Toxicity Test Methods.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2022Article
- Adequacy of sample size for estimating a value from field observational data.Ecotoxicology and environmental safety · 2020Article
- Temperature affects acute mayfly responses to elevated salinity: implications for toxicity of road de-icing salts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Article
- A flow-chart for developing water quality criteria from two field-based methods.The Science of the total environment · 2018Article
- A field-based characterization of conductivity in areas of minimal alteration: A case example in the Cascades of northwestern United States.The Science of the total environment · 2018Article
- Field-based method for evaluating the annual maximum specific conductivity tolerated by freshwater invertebrates.The Science of the total environment · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most water quality criteria are based on laboratory toxicity tests and usually include chronic and acute magnitudes. Field-based criteria are typically based on long-term or continuous exposures, so they are chronic. Biological responses of quantified, short-term aqueous exposures are seldom documented in the field. However, acute values may be derived by estimating an upper limit using temporal variance and chronic values. This method estimates an upper limit from the variance of pollutant measurements from stream locations that attain the chronic criterion. The formula for deriving a 90th centile of a standard normal distribution is used to identify the upper limit, a criterion maximum exposure concentration (CMEC). The calculated CMEC is interpreted as a maximum exposure that 95% of organisms may tolerate if the chronic exposure is not exceeded. The methods of deriving chronic and acute criteria are illustrated with specific conductivity in a mountainous area in the eastern United States. The biological relevance of the CMEC was assessed using the maximum annual exposure during the life cycle of the most salt-intolerant genera. The method using the chronic criterion and the variance of water chemistry data is practical, whereas frequently collecting and analyzing paired biological and chemical samples at numerous sites is impractical and may give misleading results due to lags in biological response. This method can be used anywhere with sufficient data to estimate the temporal variability and may be applicable for field-based criteria other than the specific conductivity criteria illustrated here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.