ArticleFertility and sterility2018
Assessing access to assisted reproductive services for serodiscordant couples with human immunodeficiency virus infection.
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medically assisted reproduction for people living with HIV in Europe: A cross-country exploratory policy comparison.HIV medicine · 2022Review
- HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for Conception Among HIV Serodiscordant Couples in the United States: A Cohort Study.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2020Article
- Successful Pregnancy and Delivery with Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in HIV-Serodiscordant Couple: the First Case in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2020Article
- HIV-, HBV-, and HCV-Related Information on U.S. Fertility Clinic Websites: A Content Analysis.Health equity · 2020Article
- The moral discourse of HIV providers within their organizational context: An ethnographic case study.Patient education and counseling · 2018Article
- Cost-effectiveness of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention for conception in the United States.AIDS (London, England) · 2018Article
- Overcoming barriers to providing HIV prevention for HIV serodiscordant couples desiring pregnancy.Fertility and sterility · 2018Article
- Implementing a Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Intervention for Safer Conception among HIV Serodiscordant Couples: Recommendations for Health Care Providers.Journal of health disparities research and practice · 2018Article
- Semen Washing and Intrauterine Insemination for Reducing the Risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission in Serodiscordant Couples: A Cross-sectional Study.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo understand the barriers that serodiscordant couples with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) face in accessing services for risk reduction and infertility using assisted reproductive technology (ART).
designTwo-arm cross-sectional telephone "secret shopper" study.
settingInfertility clinics designated by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), 140 from 15 American states with the highest prevalence of heterosexual HIV-infected men. PATIENT(S): Clinical and nonclinical staff at SART-registered clinics. INTERVENTION(S): Standardized telephone calls to SART-registered clinics by investigators in the roles of physician and patient callers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Availability and difference in services offered to callers and the rate of referral if the clinic did not provide these services. RESULT(S): Of the 140 sampled SART clinics across 15 states, callers in both patient and physician roles spoke to a staff member at greater than 90% of targeted clinics (127 clinics total). Of the physician callers 63% were told that the clinic could offer services, as compared to 40% of patient callers. Of the 55 clinics that were unable to provide services to the patient caller, 51% referred to other clinics with confidence that they could offer these services; 67% of clinics would provide services for both prevention and infertility purposes. CONCLUSION(S): Risk reduction services for HIV were more available at the sampled fertility clinics than previously reported in the literature. However, the responses depended on the person calling. The clinics demonstrated low rates of concordance with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine's guidelines, which endorse referral of patients to other facilities from sites unable to offer services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.