Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427847›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Computationally optimized ECoG stimulation with local safety constraints.

Seyhmus Guler, Moritz Dannhauer, Biel Roig-Solvas, Alexis Gkogkidis, Rob Macleod, Tonio Ball, Jeffrey G Ojemann, Dana H Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Seyhmus GulerComputational Radiology Laboratory (CRL), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: seyhmus.guler@childrens.harvard.edu.
Moritz DannhauerCenter for Integrative Biomedical Computing (CIBC), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Scientific Computing Institute (SCI), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Biel Roig-SolvasSPIRAL Group, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Alexis GkogkidisIntracranial EEG and Brain Imaging Lab, Epilepsy Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence and Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Rob MacleodCenter for Integrative Biomedical Computing (CIBC), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Scientific Computing Institute (SCI), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Tonio BallIntracranial EEG and Brain Imaging Lab, Epilepsy Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence and Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jeffrey G OjemannDepartment of Neurological Surgery and the Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Dana H BrooksCenter for Integrative Biomedical Computing (CIBC), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; SPIRAL Group, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
University of Utah · USBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Freiburg · DEHarvard University · USSpiral Foundation · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct stimulation of the cortical surface is used clinically for cortical mapping and modulation of local activity. Future applications of cortical modulation and brain-computer interfaces may also use cortical stimulation methods. One common method to deliver current is through electrocorticography (ECoG) stimulation in which a dense array of electrodes are placed subdurally or epidurally to stimulate the cortex. However, proximity to cortical tissue limits the amount of current that can be delivered safely. It may be desirable to deliver higher current to a specific local region of interest (ROI) while limiting current to other local areas more stringently than is guaranteed by global safety limits. Two commonly used global safety constraints bound the total injected current and individual electrode currents. However, these two sets of constraints may not be sufficient to prevent high current density locally (hot-spots). In this work, we propose an efficient approach that prevents current density hot-spots in the entire brain while optimizing ECoG stimulus patterns for targeted stimulation. Specifically, we maximize the current along a particular desired directional field in the ROI while respecting three safety constraints: one on the total injected current, one on individual electrode currents, and the third on the local current density magnitude in the brain. This third set of constraints creates a computational barrier due to the huge number of constraints needed to bound the current density at every point in the entire brain. We overcome this barrier by adopting an efficient two-step approach. In the first step, the proposed method identifies the safe brain region, which cannot contain any hot-spots solely based on the global bounds on total injected current and individual electrode currents. In the second step, the proposed algorithm iteratively adjusts the stimulus pattern to arrive at a solution that exhibits no hot-spots in the remaining brain. We report on simulations on a realistic finite element (FE) head model with five anatomical ROIs and two desired directional fields. We also report on the effect of ROI depth and desired directional field on the focality of the stimulation. Finally, we provide an analysis of optimization runtime as a function of different safety and modeling parameters. Our results suggest that optimized stimulus patterns tend to differ from those used in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainComputer SimulationElectrocorticographyElectrodesHumansECoGElectrocorticography stimulationLocal safety constraintsOptimizationOptimizedSafety

Identifiers

PMID29427847
PMCPMC5911187
OpenAlexW2793730012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.