ArticleMetabolic engineering2018
A mathematical framework for yield (vs. rate) optimization in constraint-based modeling and applications in metabolic engineering.
Article in Metabolic engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimal cut sets in metabolic networks: from conceptual foundations to applications in metabolic engineering and biomedicine.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- A mathematically rigorous algorithm to define, compute and assess relevance of the probable dissociation constants in characterizing a biochemical network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- ReDirection: an R-package to compute the probable dissociation constant for every reaction of a user-defined biochemical network.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- StrainDesign: a comprehensive Python package for computational design of metabolic networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- The choice of the objective function in flux balance analysis is crucial for predicting replicative lifespans in yeast.PloS one · 2022Article
- Native and non-native host assessment towards metabolic pathway reconstructions of plant natural products.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Review
- Understanding FBA Solutions under Multiple Nutrient Limitations.Metabolites · 2021Article
- Environmental flexibility does not explain metabolic robustness.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2020Article
- Comparison of Optimization-Modelling Methods for Metabolites Production in Escherichia coli.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Calcium Carbonate Addition Improves L-Methionine Biosynthesis by Metabolically EngineeredFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Characterizing and ranking computed metabolic engineering strategies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Determination of growth-coupling strategies and their underlying principles.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- RedCom: A strategy for reduced metabolic modeling of complex microbial communities and its application for analyzing experimental datasets from anaerobic digestion.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Augmenting Biogas Process Modeling by Resolving Intracellular Metabolic Activity.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- OptMDFpathway: Identification of metabolic pathways with maximal thermodynamic driving force and its application for analyzing the endogenous CO2 fixation potential of Escherichia coli.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe optimization of metabolic rates (as linear objective functions) represents the methodical core of flux-balance analysis techniques which have become a standard tool for the study of genome-scale metabolic models. Besides (growth and synthesis) rates, metabolic yields are key parameters for the characterization of biochemical transformation processes, especially in the context of biotechnological applications. However, yields are ratios of rates, and hence the optimization of yields (as nonlinear objective functions) under arbitrary linear constraints is not possible with current flux-balance analysis techniques. Despite the fundamental importance of yields in constraint-based modeling, a comprehensive mathematical framework for yield optimization is still missing.
resultsWe present a mathematical theory that allows one to systematically compute and analyze yield-optimal solutions of metabolic models under arbitrary linear constraints. In particular, we formulate yield optimization as a linear-fractional program. For practical computations, we transform the linear-fractional yield optimization problem to a (higher-dimensional) linear problem. Its solutions determine the solutions of the original problem and can be used to predict yield-optimal flux distributions in genome-scale metabolic models. For the theoretical analysis, we consider the linear-fractional problem directly. Most importantly, we show that the yield-optimal solution set (like the rate-optimal solution set) is determined by (yield-optimal) elementary flux vectors of the underlying metabolic model. However, yield- and rate-optimal solutions may differ from each other, and hence optimal (biomass or product) yields are not necessarily obtained at solutions with optimal (growth or synthesis) rates. Moreover, we discuss phase planes/production envelopes and yield spaces, in particular, we prove that yield spaces are convex and provide algorithms for their computation. We illustrate our findings by a small example and demonstrate their relevance for metabolic engineering with realistic models of E. coli.
conclusionsWe develop a comprehensive mathematical framework for yield optimization in metabolic models. Our theory is particularly useful for the study and rational modification of cell factories designed under given yield and/or rate requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.