Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427422›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2018

Relative Abundances of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata in

Michelle L Olson, Arul Jayaraman, Katy C Kao

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. New insights in the role ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Candida-associated denture stomatitis: clinical, epidemiological, and microbiological features.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Polymicrobial Biofilm Dynamics of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Pharmaceutics · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. A Factor Produced byBiomolecules · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle L OlsonDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Arul JayaramanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA arulj@mail.che.tamu.edu kao.katy@tamu.edu.
Katy C KaoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA arulj@mail.che.tamu.edu kao.katy@tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

BiofilmsCoculture TechniquesAntifungal AgentsCandida albicansCandida glabrataGene ExpressionGenes, FungalMicrobial Sensitivity TestsVirulenceAntifungal AgentsbiofilmbiofilmsCandidaCLSMcoculturemycobiota

Identifiers

PMID29427422
PMCPMC5881068
OpenAlexW2791065914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.