Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427271›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Screening cyhalothrin degradation strains from locust epiphytic bacteria and studying Paracoccus acridae SCU-M53 cyhalothrin degradation process.

Jiewei Tian, Xiufeng Long, Shuai Zhang, Qiumian Qin, Longzhan Gan, Yongqiang Tian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microbiology and Biochemistry of Pesticides Biodegradation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Novel Mechanism and Kinetics of Tetramethrin Degradation Using an IndigenousInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiewei TianKey Laboratory of Leather Chemistry and Engineering(Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and College of Light Industry, Textile & Food Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, People's Republic of China.
Xiufeng LongKey Laboratory of Leather Chemistry and Engineering(Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and College of Light Industry, Textile & Food Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, People's Republic of China.
Shuai ZhangKey Laboratory of Leather Chemistry and Engineering(Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and College of Light Industry, Textile & Food Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, People's Republic of China.
Qiumian QinKey Laboratory of Leather Chemistry and Engineering(Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and College of Light Industry, Textile & Food Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, People's Republic of China.
Longzhan GanKey Laboratory of Leather Chemistry and Engineering(Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and College of Light Industry, Textile & Food Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, People's Republic of China.
Yongqiang TianKey Laboratory of Leather Chemistry and Engineering(Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and College of Light Industry, Textile & Food Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, People's Republic of China. yqtian@scu.edu.cn.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Chengdu Science and Technology Huimin Program 2016-HM01-00409-SFNational Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFB0308401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All locust epiphytic bacteria were screened and a total of 62 epiphytic bacteria were obtained from samples of Acrida cinerea. Via phylogenetic analysis, the 62 epiphytic bacteria were allocated to 27 genera, 18 families, 13 orders, six classes, and four phylums. Then, cyhalothrin degradation experiments were conducted, and the 10 strains that degraded more than 30% cyhalothrin and Paracoccus acridae SCU-M53 showed the highest cyhalothrin degradation rate of 70.5%. Furthermore, Paracoccus acridae SCU-M53 was selected for optimal cyhalothrin biodegradation conditions via the response surface method (Design-Expert). Under the optimum conditions (28 °C, 75 mg/L, and 180 rpm), the cyhalothrin degradation rate reached 79.84% after 2 days. This suggests the possibility that isolating biodegradation cyhalothrin strains from Acrida cinerea is feasible.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiodiversityChinaEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsGrasshoppersNitrilesParacoccusPesticidesPhylogenyPyrethrinscyhalothrinEnvironmental PollutantsNitrilesPesticidesPyrethrinsAcrida cinereaBiodegradationBiodiversityCyhalothrinEpiphytic bacteria

Identifiers

PMID29427271
OpenAlexW2792937939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.