Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427182›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2018

Neural mechanisms underlying subsequent memory for personal beliefs:An fMRI study.

Erik A Wing, Vijeth Iyengar, Thomas M Hess, Kevin S LaBar, Scott A Huettel, Roberto Cabeza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erik A WingCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, LSRC Bldg., Rm. B254, Box 90999, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. eaw31@duke.edu.
Vijeth IyengarCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, LSRC Bldg., Rm. B254, Box 90999, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Thomas M HessDepartment of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Kevin S LaBarCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, LSRC Bldg., Rm. B254, Box 90999, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Scott A HuettelCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, LSRC Bldg., Rm. B254, Box 90999, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Roberto CabezaCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, LSRC Bldg., Rm. B254, Box 90999, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

Funding

Social Threat and Aging: Neural Mechanisms of Emotion RegulationR01AG034580 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CABEZA, ROBERTO · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many fMRI studies have examined the neural mechanisms supporting emotional memory for stimuli that generate emotion rather automatically (e.g., a picture of a dangerous animal or of appetizing food). However, far fewer studies have examined how memory is influenced by emotion related to social and political issues (e.g., a proposal for large changes in taxation policy), which clearly vary across individuals. In order to investigate the neural substrates of affective and mnemonic processes associated with personal opinions, we employed an fMRI task wherein participants rated the intensity of agreement/disagreement to sociopolitical belief statements paired with neural face pictures. Following the rating phase, participants performed an associative recognition test in which they distinguished identical versus recombined face-statement pairs. The study yielded three main findings: behaviorally, the intensity of agreement ratings was linked to greater subjective emotional arousal as well as enhanced high-confidence subsequent memory. Neurally, statements that elicited strong (vs. weak) agreement or disagreement were associated with greater activation of the amygdala. Finally, a subsequent memory analysis showed that the behavioral memory advantage for statements generating stronger ratings was dependent on the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Together, these results both underscore consistencies in neural systems supporting emotional arousal and suggest a modulation of arousal-related encoding mechanisms when emotion is contingent on referencing personal beliefs.

Indexed as

AttitudeEmotionsAdultAmygdalaArousalBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryPoliticsPrefrontal CortexYoung AdultAmygdalaEmotionEpisodic memory

Identifiers

PMID29427182
PMCPMC5889727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.