Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427177›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2018

Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Monitoring among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Bruce E Landon, Alan M Zaslavsky, Jeffrey Souza, John Z Ayanian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Newer long-acting insulin prescriptions for patients with type 2 diabetes: prevalence and practice variation in a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bruce E LandonDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. landon@hcp.med.harvard.edu.
Alan M ZaslavskyDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey SouzaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
John Z AyanianInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Tradeoffs in the Design of Public Long-Term Care BenefitsP01AG032952 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI John Michael McWilliams · 2009 to 2026
$39.0M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG032952NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes is a costly and common condition, but little is known about recent trends in diabetes management among Medicare beneficiaries.

objectiveTo evaluate the use of diabetes medications and testing supplies among Medicare beneficiaries. DESIGN/

settingRetrospective cohort analysis of Medicare claims from 2007 to 2014.

participantsTraditional Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of diabetes in the current or any prior year. MAIN MEASURES: We analyzed choices of first diabetes medication for those new to medication and patterns of adding medications. We also examined the use of testing supplies, use of statins and ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and spending. KEY

resultsDiagnosed diabetes increased from 28.7% to 30.2% of beneficiaries from 2007 to 2014. The use of metformin as the most commonly prescribed first medication increased from 50.2% in 2007 to 70.2% in 2014, whereas long-acting sulfonylureas decreased from 16.6% to 8.2%. The use of thiazolidinediones fell considerably, while the use of new diabetes medication classes increased. Among patients prescribed insulin, long-acting insulin as the first choice increased substantially, from 38.9% to 56.8%, but short-acting or combination regimens remained common, particularly among older or sicker beneficiaries. Prescriptions of testing supplies for more than once-daily testing were also common. The mean total cost of diabetes medications per patient increased over the period due to the increasing use of high-cost drugs, particularly by those patients with costs above the 90th percentile of spending, although the median costs decreased for both medications and testing supplies.

conclusionsThe use of metformin and long-acting insulin have increased substantially among elderly Medicare patients with diabetes, but a substantial subgroup continues to receive costly and complex treatment regimens.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCohort StudiesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMedicareMetforminRetrospective StudiesSulfonylurea CompoundsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminSulfonylurea CompoundsdiabeteselderlyMedicare

Identifiers

PMID29427177
PMCPMC5880782

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.