Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427169›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2018

Multi-pollutant Modeling Through Examination of Susceptible Subpopulations Using Profile Regression.

Eric Coker, Silvia Liverani, Jason G Su, John Molitor

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.Environmental health perspectives · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Environmental Mixtures Analysis (E-MIX) Workflow and Methods Repository.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Using Latent Class Modeling to Jointly Characterize Economic Stress and Multipollutant Exposure.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric CokerSchool of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Silvia LiveraniSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Jason G SuEnvironmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720-7360, USA.
John MolitorSchool of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. john.molitor@oregonstate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe inter-correlated nature of exposure-based risk factors in environmental health studies makes it a challenge to determine their combined effect on health outcomes. As such, there has been much research of late regarding the development and utilization of methods in the field of multi-pollutant modeling. However, much of this work has focused on issues related to variable selection in a regression context, with the goal of identifying which exposures are the "bad actors" most responsible for affecting the health outcome of interest. However, the question addressed by these approaches does not necessarily represent the only or most important questions of interest in a multi-pollutant modeling context, where researchers may be interested in health effects from co-exposure patterns and in identifying subpopulations associated with patterns defined by different levels of constituent exposures. RECENT

findingsOne approach to analyzing multi-pollutant data is to use a method known as Bayesian profile regression, which aids in identifying susceptible subpopulations associated with exposure mixtures defined by different levels of each exposure. Identification of exposure-level patterns that correspond to a location may provide a starting point for policy-based exposure reduction. Also, in a spatial context, identification of locations with the most health-relevant exposure-mixture profiles might provide further policy relevant information. In this brief report, we review and describe an approach that can be used to identify exposures in subpopulations or locations known as Bayesian profile regression. An example is provided in which we examine associations between air pollutants, an indicator of healthy food retailer availability, and indicators of poverty in Los Angeles County. A general tread suggesting that vulnerable individuals are more highly exposed and have limited access to healthy food retailers is observed, though the associations are complex and non-linear.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsHumansModels, StatisticalRegression AnalysisEnvironmental PollutantsBayesian profile regressionHealth effectsHealth policyMulti-pollutant modelingSusceptible subpopulations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.