Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427168›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2018

Diagnostic test accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in the detection of post-stroke cognitive impairment under different stages and cutoffs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dan Shi, Xiao Chen, Zheng Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06884553 (Effects of Robot-assistED Rehabilitation Versus OccupatIonal Therapy on the Functional Recovery of the Upper Limb in PatiEnts with Chronic STroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06884553 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Robot-assistED Rehabilitation Versus OccupatIonal Therapy on the Functional Recovery of the Upper Limb in PatiEnts with Chronic STroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of FlorenceRan2023 to 2025Enrolled72ConditionsChronic StrokeArmsRobotic therapy (Gloreha Sinfonia system), Occupational therapy, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Determinants of post-stroke cognitive impairment in patients with periodontal disease.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Blood-Based Biomarkers for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dan ShiSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fengling Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China.
Xiao ChenSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fengling Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China.
Zheng LiSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fengling Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China. LeeZ@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1151-8676
Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purposes of this review were to give the optimal cutoffs of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) by comparing sensitivity and specificity under different cutoffs and compare the MoCA with other screening tools in post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) determined by a neuropsychological evaluation. Articles were derived from a systematic search in PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and CINAHL and were assessed for internal validity by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The figure of risk of bias was made by Review Manager 5.3, and data of selected studies were synthesized by MetaDisc 1.4. Twelve diagnostic studies, involving 2130 patients, were included. The area under the curve (AUC) under cutoffs of 20v19, 21v20, and 26v25 are 0.90, 0.90, and 0.95, showing high predictive validity for PSCI screening within 1 month. When the sensitivity and specificity are equal important, the optimal cutoff is 20v19 (Youden Index = 0.58). Compared to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the MoCA has higher sensitivity but lower specificity. The optimal cutoff differs in different stages of stroke. Both the MMSE and MoCA are appropriate screening tools for PSCI, and the use of these two tools should be in accordance with the aim of screening. The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) can act as a supplement for the MoCA.

Indexed as

AgedArea Under CurveCognitive DysfunctionDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsStrokeACE-RCutoffMMSEMoCAPost-stroke cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID29427168
OpenAlexW2789940321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.