Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427093›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2018

Comparison between locked and unlocked intramedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures.

Riccardo Maria Lanzetti, Auro Caraffa, Domenico Lupariello, Paolo Ceccarini, Giulio Gambaracci, Luigi Meccariello, Francesco Manfreda, Daniele Maiettini, Cristina Ibáñez Vicente, Michele Scialpi and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Research progress on distal interlocking screws of cephalomedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2023
    Article
  9. Locking in trochanteric fractures: a comparison of static versus dynamic locking using the Gamma3 nail.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Riccardo Maria LanzettiU.O.C. Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, SM Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. riccarolanzetti@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1564-6379
Auro CaraffaU.O.C. Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, SM Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Domenico LuparielloUniversity of Rome, La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Paolo CeccariniU.O.C. Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, SM Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Giulio GambaracciRadio-Diagnostic Department, SM Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Luigi MeccarielloU.O.C. Orthopedics and Traumatology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
Francesco ManfredaU.O.C. Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, SM Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Daniele MaiettiniRadio-Diagnostic Department, SM Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Cristina Ibáñez VicenteU.O.C. Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, SM Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Michele ScialpiRadio-Diagnostic Department, SM Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Olga BisacciaRadiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, "Niguarda Ca' Granda" Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe RinonapoliU.O.C. Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, SM Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Michele BisacciaU.O.C. Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, SM Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITOspedale Vito Fazzi · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntertrochanteric fractures are of great interest worldwide and are the most frequently operated fractures. Intramedullary nailing is commonly used in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study is to assess the necessity of using the distal blocking screw in 31-A1 and 31-A2 fractures, classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification system (AO/OTA).

methodsThis is a prospective study of 143 consecutive patients (mean age 85.01 years, mean final follow-up 14.1 months) surgically treated with the same intramedullary nail. In 75 cases, the distal locking screw was not used. Parameters evaluated during follow-up were: blood loss, transfusion requirements, surgery duration, and fluoroscopy time. Harris Hip Score and Barthel Activity Daily Living were used for the clinical evaluation. Radiographic Union Score For Hip (RUSH score) and Tip apex distance (TAD) were measured for radiologic evaluation.

resultsThe group treated without locking screw showed significantly shorter surgical duration time (31.9 vs. 47.2 min), a decrease in blood loss (variation Hb - 1.06 vs. - 1.97), and reduced X-rays exposure time (25.4 vs. 31.6 s). No significant differences were observed in the postoperative period and in the radiographic and clinical scores.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that in intertrochanteric 31-A1 and 31-A2 stable fractures, the absence of distal locking screw does not compromise bone healing and prevents several clinical complications.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone ScrewsAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionFemaleFluoroscopyFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHip FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative CarePostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID29427093
OpenAlexW2791486519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.